This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
neels gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgneels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/26353 ) Change subject: dbg log: abis_rsl print_meas_rep(): clarify rxlev ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/26353/1/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c File src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/26353/1/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c@1349 PS1, Line 1349: rxlev2dbm(mrc->rxlev) > RXLEV is the GSM mnemonic for a value that is not normalized to 0 dBm but to -110 dBm. […] in handover configuration, logging and vty outputs, we consistently use the term "RXLEV" and usually print the negative dBm value (based on -110dBm), indicated by adding a "dBm" unit in the printout. In some places we may still print the actual on-the-wire rxlev value (0..63); this is also used in handover tests (that we got from jolly). I'm not familiar with the term RSSI, but from what i found it seems to be the correct term for that negative dBm representation. But, we use "rxlev" as label everywhere in osmo-bsc, and either we stick with that here, or we change all of osmo-bsc to use "rssi" instead, including VTY commands -- i do not see us doing that. The discussion on this trivial patch goes a bit out of proportion, should we just abandon this? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/26353 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia2c1d59eac556b8f6a56c39abf12b35a3ba807eb Gerrit-Change-Number: 26353 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:36:25 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20211129/c4406dc7/attachment.htm>