This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256 )
Change subject: pcu: Introduce test TC_t3172_*
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256/1/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn
File pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256/1/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn@2073
PS1, Line 2073: var EGPRSPktChRequest req := {
> Is there a reason why you're specifically using EGPRS Packet Channel Request here?
Not really.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256/1/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn@2086
PS1, Line 2086: }
> So if we send another RACH. […]
Yes, I took that test as a base since half of the work was already done.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256/1/pcu/PCU_Tests.ttcn@2101
PS1, Line 2101: /* Since all USF are taken, we should receive a Reject: */
> Took me a while to understand what exactly causes the Reject. […]
No, because allocating a new UL TBF from the existing UL TBF maybe releases the previous TBF before allocating the new one. I wanted to be sure I triggered the USF exhaustion and I got a Pkt Access Reject and this scenario wasn't tested so it's fine this way.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26256
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I3f4368c99b00453b471c3d741fecb8864ecdc628
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26256
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:39:27 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20211116/02867ab5/attachment.htm>