Change in osmo-pcu[master]: sba: Document AGCH_START_OFFSET after some experimental tests
gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Mon Mar 29 08:58:21 UTC 2021
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/23511 )
Change subject: sba: Document AGCH_START_OFFSET after some experimental tests
Patch Set 2:
> Patch Set 2:
> (2 comments)
> As discussed on the call yesterday, the proper way is to report the AGCH queue length to the PCU so the PCU can use this as a factor to compute the starting FN.
> Furthermore, even without the above, this is all (obviously) affected by the fn-advance and rts-advance. So even without any load-based feedback, the fn/rts advance should be taken into account.
I think neither of fn/rts advance really affect timing here.
* fn-advance is being applied in sync both scheduling CCCH and requesting the Imm ASS to the PCU.
* rts-advance is neither affected since the BTS doesn't care about the FN at which the Imm ass is sent to it from the PCU using PCU_IF_SAPI_PCH, it simply queues it with bts_agch_enqueue and schedules it ASAP. So From the point of view of the PCU, the different value in rts-advance in use doesn't matter.
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/23511
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:58:21 +0000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gerrit-log