This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
dexter gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgdexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209 ) Change subject: filesystem: decode select response for MF ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) > Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1 > > (1 comment) > > the problem here is whether it is 'legal' to make such an assumption. Afte https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209/1/pySim/filesystem.py File pySim/filesystem.py: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209/1/pySim/filesystem.py@247 PS1, Line 247: > are we sure this is the right thing to do? Which spec states that the root of any card will provide […] Oh, I did not know that. I just thought that the MF would behave like any other EF in this case. I used sysmo-usim-sjs1 and sysmo-isim-sja2 so far. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/pysim/+/23209 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: pysim Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib2b2476fc0e7d34cdacf7eb100ffadceb788c4d2 Gerrit-Change-Number: 23209 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:56:57 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210311/79de2b99/attachment.htm>