Change in osmo-ttcn3-hacks[master]: sgsn a54 tests

Hoernchen gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Wed Jun 9 01:52:44 UTC 2021


Hoernchen has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/24629 )


Change subject: sgsn a54 tests
......................................................................

sgsn a54 tests

Change-Id: Iad65cbf9840aa883cb34e53554b94a4142c82638
Related: SYS#5324
---
M sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn
M sgsn/expected-results.xml
2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)



  git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/29/24629/1

diff --git a/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn b/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn
index d760e58..0047ba8 100644
--- a/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn
+++ b/sgsn/SGSN_Tests.ttcn
@@ -2833,6 +2833,123 @@
 	f_cleanup();
 }
 
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_crypt(OCT1 netcap_a2345, BIT3 auth_req_ciph) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	var RoutingAreaIdentificationV old_ra := f_random_RAI();
+
+	var template PDU_L3_MS_SGSN attach_req := ts_GMM_ATTACH_REQ(f_mi_get_lv(), old_ra, false, false, omit, omit);
+	attach_req.msgs.gprs_mm.attachRequest.msNetworkCapability.msNetworkCapabilityV.spare_octets := netcap_a2345; /* GEA2345... */
+
+	/* send Attach Request */
+	/* indicate R99 capability of the MS to enable UMTS AKA in presence of
+	 * 3G auth vectors */
+	attach_req.msgs.gprs_mm.attachRequest.msNetworkCapability.msNetworkCapabilityV.revisionLevelIndicatior := '1'B;
+	/* The thing is, if the solSACapability is 'omit', then the
+	 * revisionLevelIndicatior is at the wrong place! */
+	attach_req.msgs.gprs_mm.attachRequest.msNetworkCapability.msNetworkCapabilityV.solSACapability := '0'B;
+	f_send_l3(attach_req);
+
+	/* do the auth */
+	var PDU_L3_MS_SGSN l3_mo;
+	var PDU_L3_SGSN_MS l3_mt;
+	var default di := activate(as_mm_identity());
+
+	var GSUP_IE auth_tuple;
+	var template AuthenticationParameterAUTNTLV autn;
+
+	g_pars.vec := f_gen_auth_vec_3g();
+	autn := {
+		elementIdentifier := '28'O,
+		lengthIndicator := lengthof(g_pars.vec.autn),
+		autnValue := g_pars.vec.autn
+		};
+	auth_tuple := valueof(ts_GSUP_IE_AuthTuple2G3G(g_pars.vec.rand,
+							g_pars.vec.sres,
+							g_pars.vec.kc,
+							g_pars.vec.ik,
+							g_pars.vec.ck,
+							g_pars.vec.autn,
+							g_pars.vec.res));
+	log("GSUP sends 2G and 3G auth tuples", auth_tuple);
+	GSUP.receive(tr_GSUP_SAI_REQ(g_pars.imsi));
+	GSUP.send(ts_GSUP_SAI_RES(g_pars.imsi, auth_tuple));
+
+	var template PDU_L3_SGSN_MS auth_ciph_req := tr_GMM_AUTH_REQ(g_pars.vec.rand, auth_req_ciph);
+	auth_ciph_req.msgs.gprs_mm.authenticationAndCipheringRequest.authenticationParameterAUTN := autn;
+	BSSGP[0].receive(auth_ciph_req) -> value l3_mt;
+
+	setverdict(pass);
+	deactivate(di);
+}
+
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a54(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	f_TC_attach_usim_crypt('10'O, '100'B);
+}
+
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a53(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	f_TC_attach_usim_crypt('20'O, '011'B);
+}
+
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_a53_a54(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	f_TC_attach_usim_crypt('30'O, '011'B);
+}
+
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_a50_a54(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	f_TC_attach_usim_crypt('30'O, '000'B);
+}
+
+private function f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a50(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
+	f_TC_attach_usim_crypt('00'O, '000'B);
+}
+
+testcase TC_attach_usim_a54_a54() runs on test_CT {
+	var BSSGP_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+	f_init();
+	f_sleep(1.0);
+	f_vty_config(SGSNVTY, "sgsn", "encryption GEA0 GEA3 GEA4");
+	vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a54), testcasename(), g_gb, 40);
+	vc_conn.done;
+	f_cleanup();
+}
+
+testcase TC_attach_usim_a54_a53() runs on test_CT {
+	var BSSGP_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+	f_init();
+	f_sleep(1.0);
+	f_vty_config(SGSNVTY, "sgsn", "encryption GEA0 GEA3 GEA4");
+	vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a53), testcasename(), g_gb, 40);
+	vc_conn.done;
+	f_cleanup();
+}
+
+testcase TC_attach_usim_a53_a54() runs on test_CT {
+	var BSSGP_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+	f_init();
+	f_sleep(1.0);
+	f_vty_config(SGSNVTY, "sgsn", "encryption GEA0 GEA3");
+	vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_TC_attach_usim_a53_a54), testcasename(), g_gb, 40);
+	vc_conn.done;
+	f_cleanup();
+}
+
+testcase TC_attach_usim_a50_a54() runs on test_CT {
+	var BSSGP_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+	f_init();
+	f_sleep(1.0);
+	f_vty_config(SGSNVTY, "sgsn", "encryption GEA0");
+	vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_TC_attach_usim_a50_a54), testcasename(), g_gb, 40);
+	vc_conn.done;
+	f_cleanup();
+}
+
+testcase TC_attach_usim_a54_a50() runs on test_CT {
+	var BSSGP_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
+	f_init();
+	f_sleep(1.0);
+	f_vty_config(SGSNVTY, "sgsn", "encryption GEA0 GEA3 GEA4");
+	vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_TC_attach_usim_a54_a50), testcasename(), g_gb, 40);
+	vc_conn.done;
+	f_cleanup();
+}
 
 /* Send LLC NULL to see if the SGSN survives it (OS#3952) */
 private function f_TC_llc_null(charstring id) runs on BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
@@ -3506,6 +3623,11 @@
 	execute( TC_attach_rau_a_a() );
 	execute( TC_attach_rau_a_b() );
 	execute( TC_attach_usim_resync() );
+	execute( TC_attach_usim_a54_a54() );
+	execute( TC_attach_usim_a54_a53() );
+	execute( TC_attach_usim_a53_a54() );
+	execute( TC_attach_usim_a50_a54() );
+	execute( TC_attach_usim_a54_a50() );
 	execute( TC_detach_unknown_nopoweroff() );
 	execute( TC_detach_unknown_poweroff() );
 	execute( TC_detach_nopoweroff() );
diff --git a/sgsn/expected-results.xml b/sgsn/expected-results.xml
index 0a36e2e..9997895 100644
--- a/sgsn/expected-results.xml
+++ b/sgsn/expected-results.xml
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_rau_a_a' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_rau_a_b' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_resync' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_a54_a54' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_a54_a53' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_a53_a54' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_a50_a54' time='MASKED'/>
+  <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_attach_usim_a54_a50' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_detach_unknown_nopoweroff' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_detach_unknown_poweroff' time='MASKED'/>
   <testcase classname='SGSN_Tests' name='TC_detach_nopoweroff' time='MASKED'/>

-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/24629
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iad65cbf9840aa883cb34e53554b94a4142c82638
Gerrit-Change-Number: 24629
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Hoernchen <ewild at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210609/536a9f4d/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list