This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882 ) Change subject: gbproxy: Add config option to name an SGSN ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (4 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882/2/src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c File src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882/2/src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c@224 PS2, Line 224: LOGPS > do we want this as NOTICE? Even the existing "INFO" might be high fro something that has the potenti […] Does this logic of sending to first SGSN make sense anyway? Can it happen that we have no TLLI? in any case, this change seems not related to this patch. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882/2/src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c@230 PS2, Line 230: i > is this change related to SGSN naming? Ack https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882/2/src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c@233 PS2, Line 233: sgsn = llist_first_entry(&cfg->sgsns, struct gbproxy_sgsn, list); This all looks like a separate patch imho. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882/2/src/gbproxy/gb_proxy.c@300 PS2, Line 300: DEBUGP(DGPRS, "CELL(%05u) using SGSN %s at NSE(%05u)\n", cell->bvci, sgsn->name, sgsn->nse->nsei); why not using LOGPSGSN here? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/21882 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2a3410dd9bebb242957e13a63ed70e447204203c Gerrit-Change-Number: 21882 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:00:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210104/7c8585be/attachment.htm>