This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26535 )
Change subject: bsc/osmo-{bsc,stp}.cfg: enable extended timestamp in logging
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
> Patch Set 1:
>
> > Patch Set 1: -Code-Review
> >
> > Wait, are you sure this is correct? You still need to keep the timestamp thing afaik.
>
> Nope, "logging print extended-timestamp" alone makes timestamps appear in the logs. I would expect both options to be mutually exclusive, but in reality the "logging print extended-timestamp" takes precedence if both are specified. Though, I can keep the "logging timestamp" if you think it makes sense.
Ok, I always thought "logging timestamp" was the one enabling/disabling timestamp printing, and "logging print extended-timestamp" was actually a format modifier if timestamp is printed.
Let's see what are others expectancies regarding this topic.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/26535
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic9c03b367514db577be3f354a83e9fea9dc02712
Gerrit-Change-Number: 26535
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:21:03 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20211213/480ae222/attachment.htm>