Change in osmo-bts[master]: rsl: parse temporary overpower value RSL CHAN ACT

dexter gerrit-no-reply at
Tue Aug 31 12:19:14 UTC 2021

dexter has posted comments on this change. ( )

Change subject: rsl: parse temporary overpower value RSL CHAN ACT

Patch Set 2:

Commit Message: 
PS1, Line 10: transfered using a propritary RSL IE (RSL_IE_OSMO_TOP_ACCH_CAP). The
> transferred, proprietary
File src/common/rsl.c: 
PS1, Line 1525: abis_rsl_osmo_top_acch_cap
> I'm wondering why are you using a struct if it is only a single uint8_t? is this expected to expand  […]
As far as I know the temporary overpower is not specified. I am wondering if there might be a need for more specific settings at some point. Also when I started I did not know if I might need some additional flags or so. That is why I started with a struct. We might consider to simplify this and just use an uint8_t without a struct. What do you think? 
> Ack
PS1, Line 1838: parse_temporary_overpower_acch_capability
> Ack

To view, visit
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I426c2510865c4a986c68f2027cc676aaac0d8a4c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 25285
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <vyanitskiy at>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin at>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:19:14 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at>
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy at>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the gerrit-log mailing list