This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23734 )
Change subject: Send EUTRAN neighs based on whether Common Id msg contained Last used E-UTRAN PLMN ID
......................................................................
Send EUTRAN neighs based on whether Common Id msg contained Last used E-UTRAN PLMN ID
>From 3GPP TS 48.008 sec 3.1.30 "Common ID":
"""
If the SCCP connection is established due to CSFB from E-UTRAN and the MSC supports
return to the last used PLMN after CS fallback, then it should send the COMMON ID message
to the BSS including the Last used E-UTRAN PLMN ID information element if available at
the MSC immediately following the successful SCCP connection setup.
"""
Furthermore, 3GPP TS 48.008 version 16.0.0 Release 16 "3.2.1.21 CLEAR COMMAND",
for field CSFB Indication, states:
"""
NOTE: This information element doesn't serve any useful purpose. MSCs should not send the
information element unless it is required by the recipients (due to the need to interwork
with older versions of the protocol). It is expected that in future versions of the present
document, this information element will be deleted from this message.
"""
Hence, build up the EUTRAN neighbor list based on whether we received
the Last E-UTRAN PLMN ID IE during Common Id. In the future, we should
probably filter the list while populating it based on the received IE.
This change will also allow reusing same mechanism for SRVCC
EUTRAN->GERAN support, where te Last E-UTRAN PLMN ID IE can be found
inside "Old BSS to New BSS information" IE in msg HANDOVER REQUEST.
Related: SYS#5337
Change-Id: I5d290ac55eca5adde1c33396422f4c10b83c03d5
---
M include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h
M include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h
M include/osmocom/bsc/lchan_fsm.h
M src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c
M src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c
M src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
M src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
M src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c
M src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c
M src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c
M src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c
M src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c
M tests/handover/handover_test.c
13 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
dexter: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
pespin: Looks good to me, approved
laforge: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
diff --git a/include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h b/include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h
index 142d535..a681bc4 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_08_08.h>
#include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_04_08.h>
#include <osmocom/core/fsm.h>
+#include "osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h"
#define BSUB_USE_CONN "conn"
@@ -48,11 +49,6 @@
GSCON_EV_LCS_LOC_REQ_END,
};
-struct gscon_clear_cmd_data {
- enum gsm0808_cause cause_0808;
- bool is_csfb;
-};
-
struct gsm_subscriber_connection;
struct gsm_network;
struct msgb;
@@ -93,3 +89,10 @@
bool gscon_is_aoip(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn);
bool gscon_is_sccplite(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn);
+
+
+static inline const struct osmo_plmn_id *gscon_last_eutran_plmn(const struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn)
+{
+ return (conn && conn->last_eutran_plmn_valid) ?
+ &conn->last_eutran_plmn : NULL;
+}
diff --git a/include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h b/include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h
index 2a9da26..448098b 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h
@@ -334,6 +334,9 @@
struct gsm48_classmark3 cm3;
bool cm3_valid;
+
+ bool last_eutran_plmn_valid;
+ struct osmo_plmn_id last_eutran_plmn;
};
@@ -614,6 +617,8 @@
bool requested;
bool do_rr_release;
enum gsm48_rr_cause rr_cause;
+ bool last_eutran_plmn_valid;
+ struct osmo_plmn_id last_eutran_plmn;
/* There is an RSL error cause of value 0, so we need a separate flag. */
bool in_error;
@@ -623,9 +628,6 @@
/* If a release event is being handled, ignore other ricocheting release events until that
* release handling has concluded. */
bool in_release_handler;
-
- /* is this release at the end of a CSFB call? */
- bool is_csfb;
} release;
/* The logical channel type */
diff --git a/include/osmocom/bsc/lchan_fsm.h b/include/osmocom/bsc/lchan_fsm.h
index 9fe7db1..ded7f54 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/bsc/lchan_fsm.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/bsc/lchan_fsm.h
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
void lchan_fsm_alloc(struct gsm_lchan *lchan);
void lchan_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool do_rr_release,
- bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr);
+ bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr,
+ const struct osmo_plmn_id *last_eutran_plmn);
void lchan_activate(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, struct lchan_activate_info *info);
void lchan_ready_to_switch_rtp(struct gsm_lchan *lchan);
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c
index 6445b6d..20fb759 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@
* the connection will presumably be torn down and lead to an lchan release. During initial
* Channel Request from the MS, an lchan has no conn yet, so in that case release now. */
if (!lchan->conn)
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, *cause_p);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, *cause_p, NULL);
else
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->fi, GSCON_EV_RSL_CONN_FAIL, (void*)cause_p);
@@ -1672,7 +1672,8 @@
"CHAN RQD/EMERGENCY-PRIORITY: inducing termination of lchan %s (state:%s) in favor of incoming EMERGENCY CALL!\n",
gsm_lchan_name(rqd->release_lchan), osmo_fsm_inst_state_name(rqd->release_lchan->fi));
- lchan_release(rqd->release_lchan, !!(rqd->release_lchan->conn), true, 0);
+ lchan_release(rqd->release_lchan, !!(rqd->release_lchan->conn), true, 0,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(rqd->release_lchan->conn));
} else {
/* BTS is shutting down, give up... */
if (rqd->release_lchan->ts->fi->state == TS_ST_NOT_INITIALIZED)
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c
index 2f241e3..faaec53 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/assignment_fsm.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
if (conn->assignment.new_lchan) {
struct gsm_lchan *lchan = conn->assignment.new_lchan;
conn->assignment.new_lchan = NULL;
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
}
if (conn->assignment.created_ci_for_msc) {
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@
if (!conn->assignment.fi) {
/* The lchan was ready, and we failed to tell the MSC about it. By releasing this lchan,
* the conn will notice that its primary lchan is gone and should clean itself up. */
- lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(conn));
return;
}
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
index a0c53cb..f169c32 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@
conn->ho.new_lchan = NULL;
if (conn->assignment.new_lchan == lchan)
conn->assignment.new_lchan = NULL;
- lchan_release(lchan, do_rr_release, err, cause_rr);
+ lchan_release(lchan, do_rr_release, err, cause_rr,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(conn));
}
void gscon_release_lchans(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, bool do_rr_release, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr)
@@ -808,7 +809,7 @@
static void gscon_fsm_allstate(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t event, void *data)
{
struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn = fi->priv;
- const struct gscon_clear_cmd_data *ccd;
+ const enum gsm0808_cause *cause_0808;
const struct tlv_parsed *tp;
struct osmo_mobile_identity mi_imsi;
@@ -826,14 +827,12 @@
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->lcs.loc_req->fi, LCS_LOC_REQ_EV_CONN_CLEAR, NULL);
OSMO_ASSERT(data);
- ccd = data;
- if (conn->lchan)
- conn->lchan->release.is_csfb = ccd->is_csfb;
+ cause_0808 = data;
/* MSC tells us to cleanly shut down */
if (conn->fi->state != ST_CLEARING)
osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg(fi, ST_CLEARING, 60, -4);
LOGPFSML(fi, LOGL_DEBUG, "Releasing all lchans (if any) after BSSMAP Clear Command\n");
- gscon_release_lchans(conn, true, bsc_gsm48_rr_cause_from_gsm0808_cause(ccd->cause_0808));
+ gscon_release_lchans(conn, true, bsc_gsm48_rr_cause_from_gsm0808_cause(*cause_0808));
/* FIXME: Release all terestrial resources in ST_CLEARING */
/* According to 3GPP 48.008 3.1.9.1. "The BSS need not wait for the radio channel
* release to be completed or for the guard timer to expire before returning the
@@ -883,6 +882,12 @@
if (!conn->bsub->imsi[0])
bsc_subscr_set_imsi(conn->bsub, mi_imsi.imsi);
}
+ if (TLVP_PRESENT(tp, GSM0808_IE_LAST_USED_EUTRAN_PLMN_ID)) {
+ conn->last_eutran_plmn_valid = true;
+ osmo_plmn_from_bcd(TLVP_VAL(tp, GSM0808_IE_LAST_USED_EUTRAN_PLMN_ID), &conn->last_eutran_plmn);
+ LOGPFSML(fi, LOGL_DEBUG, "subscr comes from E-UTRAN PLMN %s\n",
+ osmo_plmn_name(&conn->last_eutran_plmn));
+ }
gscon_update_id(conn);
break;
default:
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
index 1d29f1b..3c60f5f 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
#include <osmocom/bsc/osmo_bsc.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/bts.h>
#include <osmocom/mgcp_client/mgcp_client_endpoint_fsm.h>
+#include <osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
@@ -6111,7 +6112,8 @@
}
vty_out(vty, "%% Asking for release of %s in state %s%s", gsm_lchan_name(lchan),
osmo_fsm_inst_state_name(lchan->fi), VTY_NEWLINE);
- lchan_release(lchan, !!(lchan->conn), false, 0);
+ lchan_release(lchan, !!(lchan->conn), false, 0,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(lchan->conn));
}
return CMD_SUCCESS;
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c
index 58913e2..5e9bc69 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c
@@ -313,10 +313,10 @@
cause = msgb_put(msg, 1);
cause[0] = lchan->release.rr_cause;
- if (lchan->release.is_csfb) {
+ if (lchan->release.last_eutran_plmn_valid) {
uint8_t buf[CELL_SEL_IND_AFTER_REL_MAX_BYTES];
int len;
-
+ /* FIXME: so far we assume all configured neigbhors match last_eutran_plmn */
len = generate_cell_sel_ind_after_rel(buf, sizeof(buf), lchan->ts->trx->bts);
if (len == 0) {
LOGPLCHAN(lchan, DRR, LOGL_NOTICE, "MSC indicated CSFB Fast Return, but "
@@ -996,13 +996,15 @@
if (msg->lchan->ts->trx->bts->si_common.rach_control.t2 & 0x4) {
LOG_LCHAN(msg->lchan, LOGL_NOTICE, "MS attempts EMERGENCY SETUP although EMERGENCY CALLS"
" are not allowed in sysinfo (spec violation by MS!)\n");
- lchan_release(msg->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_PREMPTIVE_REL);
+ lchan_release(msg->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_PREMPTIVE_REL,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(msg->lchan->conn));
break;
}
if (!conn->sccp.msc->allow_emerg) {
LOG_LCHAN(msg->lchan, LOGL_NOTICE, "MS attempts EMERGENCY SETUP, but EMERGENCY CALLS are"
" denied on this BSC (check BTS config!)\n");
- lchan_release(msg->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_PREMPTIVE_REL);
+ lchan_release(msg->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_PREMPTIVE_REL,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(msg->lchan->conn));
break;
}
}
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c
index 52a92c8..e943ec1 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/gsm_08_08.c
@@ -541,7 +541,8 @@
early_exit:
if (release_lchan)
- lchan_release(lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, true, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(conn));
log_set_context(LOG_CTX_BSC_SUBSCR, NULL);
return rc;
}
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c
index 70e479f..f6dad9d 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/handover_fsm.c
@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@
struct osmo_mgcpc_ep_ci *ci;
if (conn->ho.new_lchan)
/* New lchan was activated but never passed to a conn */
- lchan_release(conn->ho.new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(conn->ho.new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL,
+ NULL);
ci = conn->ho.created_ci_for_msc;
if (ci) {
@@ -908,7 +909,8 @@
/* 3GPP TS 48.008 3.1.5.3.3 "Abnormal Conditions": if neither MS reports
* HO Failure nor the MSC sends a Clear Command, we should release the
* dedicated radio resources and send a Clear Request to the MSC. */
- lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_ABNORMAL_TIMER);
+ lchan_release(conn->lchan, true, true, GSM48_RR_CAUSE_ABNORMAL_TIMER,
+ gscon_last_eutran_plmn(conn));
/* Once the channel release is through, the BSSMAP Clear will follow. */
break;
}
@@ -964,7 +966,7 @@
/* Detach the new_lchan last, so we can still see it in above logging */
if (ho->new_lchan) {
/* Release new lchan, it didn't work out */
- lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(ho->new_lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
ho->new_lchan = NULL;
}
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c
index 0e2eb82..d58aac5 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c
@@ -165,14 +165,14 @@
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no conn:"
" cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
if (!lchan->conn->assignment.fi) {
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no"
" assignment ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->assignment.fi, ASSIGNMENT_EV_LCHAN_ESTABLISHED,
@@ -186,14 +186,14 @@
if (!lchan->conn) {
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no conn\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
if (!lchan->conn->ho.fi) {
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no"
" handover ongoing\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(lchan->conn->ho.fi, HO_EV_LCHAN_ESTABLISHED, lchan);
@@ -793,14 +793,14 @@
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no conn:"
" cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
if (!lchan->conn->assignment.fi) {
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for assignment succeeded, but lchan has no"
" assignment ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
/* After the Chan Activ Ack, the MS expects to receive an RR Assignment Command.
@@ -813,14 +813,14 @@
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no conn:"
" cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
if (!lchan->conn->ho.fi) {
LOG_LCHAN(lchan, LOGL_ERROR,
"lchan activation for handover succeeded, but lchan has no"
" handover ongoing: cannot trigger appropriate actions. Release.\n");
- lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL);
+ lchan_release(lchan, false, true, RSL_ERR_EQUIPMENT_FAIL, NULL);
break;
}
/* After the Chan Activ Ack of the new lchan, send the MS an RR Handover Command on the
@@ -1589,7 +1589,8 @@
}
void lchan_release(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool do_rr_release,
- bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr)
+ bool err, enum gsm48_rr_cause cause_rr,
+ const struct osmo_plmn_id *last_eutran_plmn)
{
if (!lchan || !lchan->fi)
return;
@@ -1603,6 +1604,10 @@
lchan->release.in_error = err;
lchan->release.do_rr_release = do_rr_release;
lchan->release.rr_cause = cause_rr;
+ if (last_eutran_plmn) {
+ lchan->release.last_eutran_plmn_valid = true;
+ memcpy(&lchan->release.last_eutran_plmn, last_eutran_plmn, sizeof(*last_eutran_plmn));
+ }
/* States waiting for events will notice the desire to release when done waiting, so it is enough
* to mark for release. */
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c b/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c
index b558fae..fc1484e 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_bssap.c
@@ -448,23 +448,27 @@
struct msgb *msg, unsigned int length)
{
struct tlv_parsed tp;
- struct gscon_clear_cmd_data ccd = {
- .is_csfb = false,
- };
+ enum gsm0808_cause cause_0808;
tlv_parse(&tp, gsm0808_att_tlvdef(), msg->l4h + 1, length - 1, 0, 0);
- ccd.cause_0808 = gsm0808_get_cause(&tp);
- if (ccd.cause_0808 < 0) {
+ cause_0808 = gsm0808_get_cause(&tp);
+ if (cause_0808 < 0) {
LOGPFSML(conn->fi, LOGL_ERROR, "Clear Command: Mandatory Cause IE not present.\n");
/* Clear anyway, but without a proper cause. */
- ccd.cause_0808 = GSM0808_CAUSE_RADIO_INTERFACE_MESSAGE_FAILURE;
+ cause_0808 = GSM0808_CAUSE_RADIO_INTERFACE_MESSAGE_FAILURE;
}
- if (TLVP_PRESENT(&tp, GSM0808_IE_CSFB_INDICATION))
- ccd.is_csfb = true;
+ if (TLVP_PRESENT(&tp, GSM0808_IE_CSFB_INDICATION) &&
+ !conn->last_eutran_plmn_valid) {
+ LOGPFSML(conn->fi, LOGL_NOTICE,
+ "Clear Command: CSFB Indication present, "
+ "but subscriber has no Last Used E-UTRAN PLMN Id! "
+ "This probably means MSC doesn't support proper return "
+ "to the last used PLMN after CS fallback.\n");
+ }
- osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->fi, GSCON_EV_A_CLEAR_CMD, &ccd);
+ osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->fi, GSCON_EV_A_CLEAR_CMD, &cause_0808);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tests/handover/handover_test.c b/tests/handover/handover_test.c
index 332c94c..917372b 100644
--- a/tests/handover/handover_test.c
+++ b/tests/handover/handover_test.c
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@
static void lchan_clear(struct gsm_lchan *lchan)
{
- lchan_release(lchan, true, false, 0);
+ lchan_release(lchan, true, false, 0, NULL);
lchan_release_ack(lchan);
}
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/23734
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5d290ac55eca5adde1c33396422f4c10b83c03d5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 23734
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210421/dd67df15/attachment.htm>