This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
fixeria gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgfixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/23795 ) Change subject: gsm0808: Introduce gsm0808_old_bss_to_new_bss_info_att_tlvdef ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1 (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/23795/1/src/gsm/gsm0808.c File src/gsm/gsm0808.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/23795/1/src/gsm/gsm0808.c@1580 PS1, Line 1580: static Is there any reason to keep this symbol static if you expose it via the function below anyway? What do we benefit from keeping it encapsulated/protected like that? I see that the same is done for bss_att_tlvdef, but still wondering. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/23795 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I0e55e947b6fef6dad0cf1a6c16b781bef4cc76c5 Gerrit-Change-Number: 23795 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:12:56 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20210420/d7fb4bf8/attachment.htm>