This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/21390 )
Change subject: gbproxy: Add TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_{sgsn,pcu}
......................................................................
gbproxy: Add TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_{sgsn,pcu}
These test cases check if gbproxy behaves as expected when it comes to
dealing with BVC-RESET on the signaling BVC. The tests are not passing
due to limitations of gbproxy. So it's not clear if the tests are 100%
correct until gbproxy is fixed.
Change-Id: Iedfe72f539ad3a0653b6ee7a050bf36ae386e88e
---
M gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn
1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
laforge: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn b/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn
index 064d1ea..9e11fc8 100644
--- a/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn
+++ b/gbproxy/GBProxy_Tests.ttcn
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@
var boolean g_initialized := false;
var boolean g_use_echo := false;
+
+ var ro_integer g_roi := {};
};
type component BSSGP_ConnHdlr {
@@ -301,6 +303,7 @@
disconnect(self:PROC, gb.vc_BSSGP:PROC);
connect(self:PCU_MGMT, gb.vc_BSSGP_BVC[i]:MGMT);
}
+ connect(self:PCU_MGMT, gb.vc_BSSGP:MGMT);
}
private function f_init_gb_sgsn(inout GbInstance gb, charstring id, integer offset) runs on test_CT {
@@ -320,6 +323,7 @@
disconnect(self:PROC, gb.vc_BSSGP:PROC);
connect(self:SGSN_MGMT, gb.vc_BSSGP_BVC[i]:MGMT);
}
+ connect(self:SGSN_MGMT, gb.vc_BSSGP:MGMT);
}
@@ -1933,6 +1937,57 @@
f_cleanup();
}
+private altstep as_count_bvc_block(integer sgsn_idx, BssgpBvci bvci, inout ro_integer roi)
+runs on test_CT {
+ var BSSGP_BVC_CT sgsn_bvc_ct := f_get_sgsn_bvc_ct(sgsn_idx, bvci);
+ [] SGSN_MGMT.receive(tr_BssgpStsInd(?, bvci, BVC_S_BLOCKED)) from sgsn_bvc_ct {
+ roi := roi & { bvci };
+ }
+}
+/* reset the signaling BVC from one BSS; expect no signaling BVC reset on SGSN; but BVC-BLOCK for PTP */
+testcase TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_bss() runs on test_CT {
+
+ f_init();
+ f_sleep(3.0);
+
+ /* Start BVC-RESET procedure for BVCI=0 */
+ PCU_MGMT.send(BssgpResetRequest:{cause:=BSSGP_CAUSE_OM_INTERVENTION}) to g_pcu[0].vc_BSSGP;
+
+ /* Activate altsteps: One for each PTP BVC within that PCUs NSE */
+ var ro_default defaults := {};
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(g_pcu[0].cfg.bvc); i := i+1) {
+ var BssgpBvcConfig bvcc := g_pcu[0].cfg.bvc[i];
+ var default d := activate(as_count_bvc_block(0, bvcc.bvci, g_roi));
+ defaults := defaults & { d };
+ }
+
+ timer T := 3.0;
+ T.start;
+ alt {
+ [] SGSN_MGMT.receive(BssgpResetIndication:{0}) {
+ setverdict(fail, "BSS-side Reset of BVCI=0 should not propagate");
+ }
+ [] T.timeout;
+ }
+
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(defaults); i := i+1) {
+ deactivate(defaults[i]);
+ }
+
+ /* check if BVC-block was received on all expected BVC */
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(g_pcu[0].cfg.bvc); i := i+1) {
+ var BssgpBvcConfig bvcc := g_pcu[0].cfg.bvc[i];
+ if (not ro_integer_contains(g_roi, bvcc.bvci)) {
+ setverdict(fail, "Missing SGSN-side BVC-BLOCK of BVCI=", bvcc.bvci);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* check if BVC-block was not received on any unexpected BVC is not required as
+ * such a message would basically run into 'no matching clause' */
+
+ f_cleanup();
+}
+
private function f_reset_ptp_bvc_from_sgsn(integer pcu_idx, integer bvc_idx) runs on test_CT
{
var BSSGP_BVC_CT pcu_bvc_ct := g_pcu[pcu_idx].vc_BSSGP_BVC[bvc_idx];
@@ -1964,6 +2019,50 @@
f_cleanup();
}
+private altstep as_count_bvc0_block(integer pcu_idx, Nsei nsei, inout ro_integer roi)
+runs on test_CT {
+ var BSSGP_CT pcu_ct := g_pcu[pcu_idx].vc_BSSGP;
+ [] PCU_MGMT.receive(BssgpResetIndication:{0}) from pcu_ct {
+ roi := roi & { nsei };
+ }
+}
+/* reset the signaling BVC from the SGSN; expect all signaling BVC on all BSS to be reset */
+testcase TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_sgsn() runs on test_CT {
+
+ f_init();
+ f_sleep(3.0);
+
+ /* Start BVC-RESET procedure for BVCI=0 */
+ SGSN_MGMT.send(BssgpResetRequest:{cause:=BSSGP_CAUSE_OM_INTERVENTION}) to g_sgsn[0].vc_BSSGP;
+
+ /* Activate altsteps: One for each PCU NSE */
+ var ro_default defaults := {};
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(g_pcu); i := i+1) {
+ var NSConfiguration nscfg := mp_nsconfig_pcu[i];
+ var default d := activate(as_count_bvc0_block(i, nscfg.nsei, g_roi));
+ defaults := defaults & { d };
+ }
+
+ f_sleep(3.0);
+
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(defaults); i := i+1) {
+ deactivate(defaults[i]);
+ }
+
+ /* check if BVC-block was received on all expected BVC */
+ for (var integer i := 0; i < lengthof(g_pcu); i := i+1) {
+ var NSConfiguration nscfg := mp_nsconfig_pcu[i];
+ if (not ro_integer_contains(g_roi, nscfg.nsei)) {
+ setverdict(fail, "Missing PCU-side BVC-RESET of BVCI=0 on PCU index ", i);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* check if BVC-block was not received on any unexpected BVC is not required as
+ * such a message would basically run into 'no matching clause' */
+
+ f_cleanup();
+}
+
control {
execute( TC_BVC_bringup() );
execute( TC_ul_unitdata() );
@@ -1976,7 +2075,9 @@
execute( TC_bvc_block_ptp() );
execute( TC_bvc_unblock_ptp() );
execute( TC_bvc_reset_ptp_from_bss() );
+ execute( TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_bss() );
execute( TC_bvc_reset_ptp_from_sgsn() );
+ execute( TC_bvc_reset_sig_from_sgsn() );
if (false) {
/* don't enable this by default, as we don't yet have any automatic test setup for FR with 4 NS-VC */
execute( TC_load_sharing_dl() );
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/21390
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iedfe72f539ad3a0653b6ee7a050bf36ae386e88e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21390
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20201128/118ddb26/attachment.htm>