This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/18616 ) Change subject: Split GSM_BTS_TYPE_OSMOBTS to individual BTS types ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1 why do you want to do this? I think it just complicates things for the user. The important part is whether or not the BTS is osmo-bts on the remote end. Everything else can and should be automatically detected by menas of (extensions of) OML. So yes, we should accept 'osmo-bts' as synonym for 'sysmobts', but beyond that I'm not convinced, particularly as the commitlog doesn't give any statement why/ -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/18616 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I00a815cfa6daab126742d27843e700c07c1db183 Gerrit-Change-Number: 18616 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 18:47:20 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200531/3284d895/attachment.htm>