Change in osmo-bsc[master]: Split GSM_BTS_TYPE_OSMOBTS to individual BTS types

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Sun May 31 18:47:20 UTC 2020


laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/18616 )

Change subject: Split GSM_BTS_TYPE_OSMOBTS to individual BTS types
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

why do you want to do this? I think it just complicates things for the user.  The important part is whether or not the BTS is osmo-bts on the remote end.  Everything else can and should be automatically detected by menas of (extensions of) OML.

So yes, we should accept 'osmo-bts' as synonym for 'sysmobts', but beyond that I'm not convinced, particularly as the commitlog doesn't give any statement why/


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/18616
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I00a815cfa6daab126742d27843e700c07c1db183
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18616
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Vadim Yanitskiy <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 18:47:20 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200531/3284d895/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list