This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orglaforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19033 ) Change subject: remove code not specific to USB from usb.c to intf_line.c ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19033/2/src/e1d.h File src/e1d.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19033/2/src/e1d.h@85 PS2, Line 85: e1_intf_new( actually if the naming conventions as I undertand it so far were strictly followed, it would have to be called e1d_new_intf. e1d because the first argument is a daemon, then the action and finally the newly added object. Likewise below it would have to be e1_intf_new_line(). What do you think? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-e1d/+/19033 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-e1d Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I7d4d4ab39cb3e7e6a7eb8e738a367122eb3fbee2 Gerrit-Change-Number: 19033 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Assignee: tnt <tnt at 246tNt.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: tnt <tnt at 246tNt.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:23:11 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200629/f099018a/attachment.htm>