Change in osmo-msc[master]: add full SDP codec information to the MNCC socket

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

neels gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Sat Jul 11 02:13:56 UTC 2020


neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953 )

Change subject: add full SDP codec information to the MNCC socket
......................................................................


Patch Set 6:

(7 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6//COMMIT_MSG 
Commit Message:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6//COMMIT_MSG@39 
PS6, Line 39: mnccc_release_sent
> ccc? ;)
heh we should invent that, a hacker's call control interface for congresses


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c 
File src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@10 
PS6, Line 10: 	/* In order of preference. TODO: make configurable */
> Are we adding regression here? Wasn't it already configurable before?
i should check that indeed.
I think the preference passed from the BSS still matters most, but I should take another look


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@11 
PS6, Line 11: 	static const enum gsm48_bcap_speech_ver mobile_codecs[] = {
> Not sure if it really makes sense having this static here.
right, doesn't


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/cc_sdp.c@27 
PS6, Line 27: 	static const enum gsm48_bcap_speech_ver utran_codecs[] = {
neither


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c 
File src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/codec_sdp_cc_t9n.c@170 
PS6, Line 170: const struct codec_mapping *codec_mapping_by_gsm0808_speech_codec_type(enum gsm0808_speech_codec_type sct, uint16_t cfg)
> either fix the TODO or mark cfg as unused for the compiler.
how?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c 
File src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/src/libmsc/sdp_msg.c@558 
PS6, Line 558: 	if (codec->rate != 8000)
> Next time, please split this kind of stuff into separate commits for easier review.
will split, missed this one


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err 
File tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953/6/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_call.err@429 
PS6, Line 429: 
> This empty line in stderr (libosmocore log) looks suspìcious. […]
will check



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-msc/+/15953
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-msc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8c3b2de53ffae4ec3a66b9dabf308c290a2c999f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15953
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:13:56 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200711/d9d3fbef/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list