This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743 ) Change subject: add ipa ping/pong keepalive for OML/RSL links between bts and bsc ...................................................................... Patch Set 10: Code-Review-1 (7 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c File src/input/ipaccess.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@74 PS10, Line 74: struct osmo_fsm_inst** ka_fsm; I don't see a point in using pointers to pointers here simply to have 3 shorter lines which fit anyway, so better remove it and use e1i_ts->driver.ipaccess.ka_fsm for everyone's mental sanity :) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@130 PS10, Line 130: struct osmo_fsm_inst** ka_fsm; Again avoid this. If you want, catch any of this in a pointer: ipaccess_line_ts(bfd, line) &ipaccess_line_ts(bfd, line)->driver &ipaccess_line_ts(bfd, line)->driver.ipaccess https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@262 PS10, Line 262: ka_fsm = &ipaccess_line_ts(newbfd, new_line)->driver.ipaccess.ka_fsm; This chunk is mostly copied from the OML part above. Feels like it'd be clearer to have it in a static function. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@304 PS10, Line 304: struct osmo_fsm_inst** ka_fsm = &ipaccess_line_ts(bfd, line)->driver.ipaccess.ka_fsm; Same, avoid pointers to pointers for this kind of use. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@390 PS10, Line 390: struct osmo_fsm_inst* ka_fsm = ipaccess_line_ts(bfd, line)->driver.ipaccess.ka_fsm; I didn't know you could do this with static inline functions (as if it was a macro). Not sure if all compilers are going to like it. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@1045 PS10, Line 1045: if (line->ipa_kap) { I see this chunk of code again and again. I'm sure it can go into a function. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743/10/src/input/ipaccess.c@1111 PS10, Line 1111: if (line->ipa_kap) { Same chunk of code again. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-abis/+/14743 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-abis Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I30e3bd601e55355aaf738ee2f2c44c1ec2c46c6a Gerrit-Change-Number: 14743 Gerrit-PatchSet: 10 Gerrit-Owner: Hoernchen <ewild at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Assignee: osmith <osmith at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Hoernchen <ewild at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: fixeria <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge at osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:12:29 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20200122/3b39a379/attachment.htm>