This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Max gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgMax has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13305 Change subject: BTS: use PCU-related test cases as version string ...................................................................... BTS: use PCU-related test cases as version string When running PCU-related tests against BTS use name of the test as a PCU version string sent from TTCN-3 code. This makes it easier to separate OsmoBTS log output related to different test cases. Change-Id: I9ef9e46061ef116529bdea196050f914804615b3 --- M bts/BTS_Tests.ttcn 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-ttcn3-hacks refs/changes/05/13305/1 diff --git a/bts/BTS_Tests.ttcn b/bts/BTS_Tests.ttcn index 86d43fe..5c43453 100644 --- a/bts/BTS_Tests.ttcn +++ b/bts/BTS_Tests.ttcn @@ -2726,30 +2726,40 @@ /* PDCH activation via PCU socket; check for presence of RTS.req */ testcase TC_pcu_act_req() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "act_req"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); } /* PDCH activation via PCU socket on non-PDCU timeslot */ testcase TC_pcu_act_req_wrong_ts() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "act_req_wrong_ts"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 1, false); } /* PDCH activation via PCU socket on wrong BTS */ testcase TC_pcu_act_req_wrong_bts() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "act_req_wrong_bts"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(23, 0, 7, false); } /* PDCH activation via PCU socket on wrong TRX */ testcase TC_pcu_act_req_wrong_trx() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "act_req_wrong_trx"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 23, 7, false); } /* PDCH deactivation via PCU socket; check for absence of RTS.req */ testcase TC_pcu_deact_req() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "deact_req"))); + /* Activate PDCH */ f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_sleep(1.0); @@ -2760,6 +2770,8 @@ /* Attempt to deactivate a PDCH on a non-PDCH timeslot */ testcase TC_pcu_deact_req_wrong_ts() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "deact_req_wrong_ts"))); + f_TC_pcu_deact_req(0, 0, 1); } @@ -2769,10 +2781,11 @@ var PCUIF_send_data sd; timer T:= 3.0; f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "ver_si13"))); /* Set SI13 via RSL */ f_rsl_bcch_fill_raw(RSL_SYSTEM_INFO_13, si13); - PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "BTS_Test v23"))); + T.start; alt { [] PCU.receive(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, tr_PCUIF_DATA_IND(0, 0, 0, ?, PCU_IF_SAPI_BCCH))) -> value sd { @@ -2825,6 +2838,8 @@ /* Send DATA.req on invalid BTS */ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_wrong_bts() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_wrong_bts"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_data_req(23, 0, 7, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this wasn't actually sent and didn't crash BTS? */ @@ -2834,6 +2849,8 @@ /* Send DATA.req on invalid TRX */ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_wrong_trx() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_wrong_trx"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_data_req(0, 100, 7, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this wasn't actually sent and didn't crash BTS? */ @@ -2843,6 +2860,8 @@ /* Send DATA.req on invalid timeslot */ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_wrong_ts() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_wrong_ts"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_data_req(0, 0, 70, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this wasn't actually sent and didn't crash BTS? */ @@ -2852,6 +2871,8 @@ /* Send DATA.req on timeslot that hasn't been activated */ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_ts_inactive() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_ts_inactive"))); + f_pcu_data_req(0, 0, 7, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this wasn't actually sent and didn't crash BTS? */ f_sleep(2.0); @@ -2859,6 +2880,8 @@ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_pdtch() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_pdtch"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_wait_rts_and_data_req(0, 0, 7, PCU_IF_SAPI_PDTCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this was actually sent */ @@ -2867,6 +2890,8 @@ testcase TC_pcu_data_req_ptcch() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_ptcch"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_wait_rts_and_data_req(0, 0, 7, PCU_IF_SAPI_PTCCH, c_PCU_DATA); /* FIXME: how to check this was actually sent */ @@ -2880,6 +2905,8 @@ f_init_l1ctl(); f_l1_tune(L1CTL); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_agch"))); + f_TC_pcu_act_req(0, 0, 7, true); f_pcu_data_req(0, 0, 7, 0, 0, PCU_IF_SAPI_AGCH, c_PCU_DATA); @@ -2902,6 +2929,8 @@ f_init_l1ctl(); f_l1_tune(L1CTL); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "data_req_imm_ass_pch"))); + /* append 3 last imsi digits so BTS can compute pagng group */ var uint32_t fn := f_PCUIF_tx_imm_ass_pch(PCU, g_pcu_conn_id, imm_ass, '123459987'H); @@ -2925,6 +2954,8 @@ f_init_l1ctl(); f_l1_tune(L1CTL); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "rach_content"))); + var GsmFrameNumber fn_last := 0; for (var integer i := 0; i < 1000; i := i+1) { var OCT1 ra := f_rnd_ra_ps(); @@ -2964,6 +2995,8 @@ testcase TC_pcu_paging_from_rsl() runs on test_CT { f_init(); + PCU.send(t_SD_PCUIF(g_pcu_conn_id, ts_PCUIF_TXT_IND(0, PCU_VERSION, "paging_from_rsl"))); + for (var integer i := 0; i < 100; i := i+1) { var MobileL3_CommonIE_Types.MobileIdentityLV mi; timer T := 3.0; -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/13305 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-ttcn3-hacks Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: I9ef9e46061ef116529bdea196050f914804615b3 Gerrit-Change-Number: 13305 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190318/e2356b33/attachment.htm>