Change in ...osmo-bsc[master]: logging: introduce LOG_BTS and LOG_TRX and use it everywhere

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

laforge gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Thu Jun 13 15:55:09 UTC 2019


laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/14439 )

Change subject: logging: introduce LOG_BTS and LOG_TRX and use it everywhere
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14439/2/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c 
File src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14439/2/src/osmo-bsc/abis_nm.c@1704 
PS2, Line 1704: int abis_nm_get_attr(struct gsm_bts *bts, uint8_t obj_class, uint8_t bts_nr, uint8_t trx_nr, uint8_t ts_nr,
> Looks like we should be passing here "struct gsm_bts_trx *trx" instead of "bts" + "trx_nr". […]
bts->nr != the Abis OML BTS number!

bts->nr relates to the logical BTS number inside the entire BSC scope, wherease the OML MO BTS number refers to the BTS in that given OML link.  A site will typically have three BTSs, so there's always 0,1,2 at a three-sector setup.  In Abis/IP you will have separate TCP/IPA connections for those, where each BTS is OML MO BTS Number 0.  In [reasonable] E1 sestups, you will only have a single E1 signaling timeslot with ML MO BTS Number 0/1/2.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14439/2/src/osmo-bsc/acc_ramp.c 
File src/osmo-bsc/acc_ramp.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14439/2/src/osmo-bsc/acc_ramp.c@170 
PS2, Line 170: 	if (trx->nr != 0)
> If we only care about first TRX, I'm not sure it makes sense to use LOG_TRX in this function and use […]
I agree.  However, this patch is merely a "mechanical" change from the existing code to new code.  Even the existing code is logging (bts=%d,trx=%d) so I keep it that way, without introducing more changes than needed in this one patch.



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/14439
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4a7814d164384eecfb6913c31802cf2faead6e6c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 14439
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge at gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:55:09 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190613/d643cb34/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list