This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
pespin gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgpespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/14670 ) Change subject: osmo-bts-trx/trx_if.c: properly describe TRXD messages in logs ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14670/1/src/osmo-bts-trx/trx_if.c File src/osmo-bts-trx/trx_if.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/14670/1/src/osmo-bts-trx/trx_if.c@744 PS1, Line 744: static char buf[256]; > I was thinking about potential performance impact. […] that stack allocation is for free, no overhead exists. Instead of moving an address X to register, it'd be moving X-256, so that's not really a valid reason in my opinion. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/14670 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I68729dc98a1840d2aa9e091153d176a103d5a228 Gerrit-Change-Number: 14670 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 14:49:03 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <axilirator at gmail.com> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190707/573dedbf/attachment.htm>