Change in ...osmo-trx[master]: Transceiver: Get rid of SoftVector in struct trx_ul_burst_ind

pespin gerrit-no-reply at
Tue Jul 2 11:15:12 UTC 2019

pespin has posted comments on this change. ( )

Change subject: Transceiver: Get rid of SoftVector in struct trx_ul_burst_ind

Patch Set 1:

> Patch Set 1:
> > I'm not quite sure this (like many other patches here) are a big improvement [...]
> ACK. This change looks more like getting rid of C++ code and rewriting to C. What are the benefits?

The idea is to slowly get rid of lots of boilerplate classes and code which are not really useful since we already have libosmocore counterparts, shrinking and cleaning up osmo-trx code base. It also makes it easier for people used to osmocom code to understand, contribute and maintain the code, lowering the entry barrier. I usually find myself losing time trying having to go through all those classes to understand a small snippet of code, and end up seeing there's not real point in using them, and those contain lots of death code anyway.
After these changes I find all this related code far easier to understand and improve than it was before.

By cleaning up the code it was visible for instance that normalization procedure was applied to guard periods which are not really used from that point onwards. By using C++ classes in low level code I ended up having to use silly for loops in some places a long time ago instead of using memcpy, etc.

So as the guy who's usually investing efforts in fixing stuff and adding new features to osmo-trx, I really see the benefits on the long run.

To view, visit
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit

Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I726e5a98a43367a22c9a4ca5cbd9eb87e6765c7a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 14643
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge at>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin at>
Gerrit-CC: fixeria <axilirator at>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:15:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the gerrit-log mailing list