This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgNeels Hofmeyr has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12469 ) Change subject: add osmo_lu_type_names[], osmo_lu_type_name() ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (2 comments) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12469/2/src/gsm/gsm48.c File src/gsm/gsm48.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12469/2/src/gsm/gsm48.c@1141 PS2, Line 1141: GSM48_LUPD_NORMAL > BTW: what about GSM48_LUPD_RESERVED? what do you mean? I am basically moving https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/12469/2/src/gsm/gsm48.c@1144 PS2, Line 1144: { > cosmetic: in other 'value_string' statements of this file '{ 0, NULL }' is used. yes, and there is no reason to name the elements if it's all to be default-initialized... verify_value_string_arrays_are_terminated.py in osmo-ci does accept both. There has been a lengthy discussion about {} vs {0} elsewhere, I don't think we agreed on anything. I'm a '{}' advocate. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/12469 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 Gerrit-Change-Number: 12469 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002) Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 22:01:29 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-HasLabels: No -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20190106/6769b74f/attachment.htm>