Change in osmo-bsc[master]: paging: Make default T3113 timeout dynamic

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Thu Nov 8 17:29:17 UTC 2018


Neels Hofmeyr has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/11654 )

Change subject: paging: Make default T3113 timeout dynamic
......................................................................


Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

(4 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/1/src/osmo-bsc/paging.c
File src/osmo-bsc/paging.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/1/src/osmo-bsc/paging.c@300
PS1, Line 300: 		return d->val;
what if the user wants a fixed value == the default val? maybe a vty option like 'dynamic-T3113' / 'no dynamic-T3113' would be better


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/1/src/osmo-bsc/paging.c@312
PS1, Line 312: 	to = (to_us + 999999) / 1000000 + d->default_val;
maybe using user supplied d->val would be better?


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/1/src/osmo-bsc/paging.c@313
PS1, Line 313: 	LOGP(DPAG, LOGL_DEBUG, "(bts=%d) Paging request calculated T3113 expires in %u seconds\n",
sprinkle colons: "Paging request: calculated T3113: expires in %u seconds"

(if you agree with above vty config option, maybe s/calculated/dynamic)

Actually, I would rather log that below, where the timer actually gets fired.
It's a common pattern of utility functions like this, maybe they get used for just quickly taking a look or somesuch, and then they log as if it was the real thing.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/1/src/osmo-bsc/paging.c@348
PS1, Line 348: 	int t3113_timeout_s = calculate_timer_3113(bts);
I know, but in our coding style we declare vars at top. I'd drop that rule, but here we are.

(rather stick to unsigned int? Or instead int above? well whatever)



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/11654
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4fb2969b690151415038631fb6ad059aa6835c7f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11654
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:29:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: Yes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20181108/e5a55d19/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list