This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 2: Code-Review-1 I agree with Max that the --with-sysmobts= arg matches the --with-litecell15= and --with-octsdr options. We won't add '-headers' to the others because that would only create build fallout. And we should keep the pattern similar, so let's keep it as --with-sysmobts for hysterical raisins. Still important to me is: using --with-sysmobts makes sense only when it implies --enable-sysmocom-bts (If I pass --with-sysmobts alone and it has no effect, I would consider it a bug). And --enable-sysmocom-bts only makes sense when it uses a sane default for --with-sysmobts (what stsp said). If the empty value works, then that would be fine. Maybe an explicit './' would be ... more explicit. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/5870 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I0416a9f4c428189cd9c3909c8bd016ca2908128a Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Sperling <ssperling at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: No