This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Pau Espin Pedrol gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 1: I agree, using the term TX/RX "path" sounds better to me, but I tried to stick to UHD terminology. > Adding more command-line arguments is in-line with the current > "architecture" but becomes more and more clumsy and cumbersom - at > some point we have to introduce the libosmovty based config file > that we're talking about for years. The question is whether we > should keep adding new argumetns, or simply refuse to do so until a > config file exists... I agree that we should move to VTY, as it starts to be cumbersome to add more parameters and manage them. There's a ticket already created to do it: https://osmocom.org/issues/2183. Shall we increase priority? I or someone else can work on that at some point. However, I still think having this RX/TX antenna support has more priority so let's merge it for now and drop all the parameters later. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6238 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I1735e6ab05a05b0312d6d679b16ebd4a2260fa23 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <axilirator at gmail.com> Gerrit-HasComments: No