Change in osmo-bsc[master]: paging: Add VTY options to calculate T3113 timeout dynamically

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.org
Tue Dec 4 17:11:33 UTC 2018


Neels Hofmeyr has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/11654 )

Change subject: paging: Add VTY options to calculate T3113 timeout dynamically
......................................................................


Patch Set 5: Code-Review-1

(4 comments)

I don't like this patch but if you fix the string issues I'm not blocking anymore.

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/3/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
File src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/3/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@3916
PS3, Line 3916: 	"T-number, optionally preceded by 't' or 'T'.")
> Following your logic, it's clear that in "foo bar?", ? applies only to last parameter, and not to wh […]
This is about the user typing on the vty and reading the online help. I think above example did show that user experience.

I still think this isn't nice:

  > no timer-dynamic?
  Calculate T3113 dynamically based on channel config and load

because in all cases I know, the help string is useful for the entire command issued so far, not assuming that the user is manually negating what is being said.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/5/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c
File src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/5/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@3940
PS5, Line 3940: 	"Calculate T3113 dynamically based on channel config and load\n"
as I said, I still think this is misleading and not nice.

If you really must do this, then at least define a common FOO_STR instead of duping the char constant.

But I'd still urge you to rather fix the vty online doc for the 'no' case.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/5/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@3941
PS5, Line 3941: 	"T-number, optionally preceded by 't' or 'T'.")
here is another FOO_STR candidate.


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/11654/5/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_vty.c@3955
PS5, Line 3955: 		vty_out(vty, "T%d has no dynamic%s", d->T, VTY_NEWLINE);
so you also disagree with the other thing I said...



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/11654
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4fb2969b690151415038631fb6ad059aa6835c7f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11654
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder (1000002)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin at sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Stefan Sperling <stsp at stsp.name>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:11:33 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: Yes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/gerrit-log/attachments/20181204/2fd0ac02/attachment.htm>


More information about the gerrit-log mailing list