This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 2: Code-Review+2 > > I'm not sure if it is worth keeping around the old r98 data > > structure under a separate name. nobody can so far be using it, > as > > the name with r98 suffix is new. What's the rationale to keep > it? > > I was trying to follow the _r98 / _r99 pattern seen further below > in the file. Besides the spare bits distribution, there are no > changes in r99, only additions, but I assume we would like to > reflect which is present in which revision. I think in case there are only additions, there's no need for an additional data type. one can just put a comment there indicating the release of the specs introducing the element, if needed. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/1859 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: If87e07b5d04e1617155383e14c98d2125fdd0608 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: No