This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 1: > I'm not sure if it is worth keeping around the old r98 data > structure under a separate name. nobody can so far be using it, as > the name with r98 suffix is new. What's the rationale to keep it? I was trying to follow the _r98 / _r99 pattern seen further below in the file. Besides the spare bits distribution, there are no changes in r99, only additions, but I assume we would like to reflect which is present in which revision. gsm48_hdr_msg_type_r98() is also not used by anyone AFAICT. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/1859 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: If87e07b5d04e1617155383e14c98d2125fdd0608 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: No