This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 4: Would you be fine with calling the structs *_subscriber and still prefix the functions with the shorter *_sub_? Background: In vlr.h, we have subscriber related things except vlr_subscriber itself prefixed 'vlr_sub_' (from you). I actually liked its brevity because I had to type a lot of subscriber (and it's a word that I often mistype for some reason). That's why I went on to use bsc_sub_ and gprs_sub_, and thought why not name the structs the same as the function prefix. (still leaving as -2 because the issue that testing this failed is not resolved yet; but will be fairly soon) -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/1682 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia61cc00e8bb186b976939a4fc8f7cf9ce6aa3d8e Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Project: openbsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Holger Freyther <holger at freyther.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: No