This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
prasadkg gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 1: > I think instead of adding another function which is doing pretty > much the same as existing one we should just replace existing > implementation while keeping the interface the same. This would > allow the code which relies on old functions to immediately benefit > from new implementations without the need for patching. The additional parameters are required, though I agree that some of them can be optimized. For example last two parameters are required for getting the number of bits processed by the algorithm and maximum bits available in the buffer. So it may not be possible to keep the interface same. Yes the existing function can be replaced if all agree. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/415 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Iae153d3639ea6b891c1fc10d7801a435c9492e26 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: prasadkg <Prasad.Kaup at radisys.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Max <msuraev at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: prasadkg <Prasad.Kaup at radisys.com> Gerrit-HasComments: No