This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org/.
Neels Hofmeyr gerrit-no-reply at lists.osmocom.orgPatch Set 1: Code-Review-1 (16 comments) Apologies, I'm very nitpicky on docs and English. I find that it's written quite well, but I still had a lot of two cents to add. It might have been faster to just edit myself... https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/1497/1/OsmoBTS/chapters/configuration.adoc File OsmoBTS/chapters/configuration.adoc: Line 186: It is possible to run multiple instances of *osmo-bts* on one and the same we usually mark binaries with backticks in the manuals `osmo-bts` though this isn't really a binary (would be `osmo-bts-foo`). So actually I guess we'd write OsmoBTS instead. Line 190: Since usually a BTS instance comes included with its individual PCU instance, included is a bit misleading. maybe like this? Since usually a BTS instance runs in conjunction with a dedicated PCU instance, Line 191: the socket-path between PCU and BTS has to be individualized as well. It is The English don't use word-joining or wordjoining like Germans do. Rather say socket path Instead of "individualized...as well" I'd say has to be distinguished between the two running instances. Line 201: The VTY can be bound to a free ip-address from the loopback range: drop the hyphen, and maybe IP should be capitalized? IP address and maybe tweak as can be bound to any IP address available on the system, e.g. to a free IP address from the loopback range: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/1497/1/OsmoNITB/chapters/running.adoc File OsmoNITB/chapters/running.adoc: Line 65: Running multiple instances of *osmo-nitb* is possible if all interfaces (vty, backtick `osmo-nitb` Capitalize "VTY" and "OML"? Line 66: oml) are separated using the appropriate configuration options. The ip based "IP" ? Line 68: processes, the user has to bind those services to specific but different 2x whitespace errors at end of line Line 69: ip-addresses. IP addresses Line 71: The VTY and the control interface can be bind to ip-addresses from the loopback "For example,..." / "bound" / "IP addresses" Line 74: .Example: Binding VTY and control interface to a specific ip-address IP address Line 82: The OML interface also needs be separated by binding it to different ip "needs to be" / "IP" Line 84: address range here since the address we binding on has to be reachable (from rather Usually, it is not possible [...] since the OML interface needs to be reachable by an external BTS. (with osmo-bts-trx or on a sysmoBTS NITB config, it is quite possible to run both osmo-bts and osmo-nitb on the same box.) Line 85: outside) to the bts. If only one ethernet interface is available, subdevices a rare case where the English do hyphenate: sub-devices ...why do I know stuff like this !?!? Line 86: with different ip addresses can be created. IP Line 88: .Example: Binding OML to a specific ip-address IP address Line 94: NOTE: Depending on the application it is necessary to have different ARFCN, comma after 'application' / include the word 'settings' somewhere, e.g. at the end of the sentence. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/1497 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I69adeef85adda6f08b31b7d176f51e16968c1435 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: osmo-gsm-manuals Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes