From holger at freyther.de Sat Jun 23 23:01:16 2018 From: holger at freyther.de (Holger Freyther) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 00:01:16 +0100 Subject: State of the "mass" tests Message-ID: Just a quick update/note. I made some progress on the "mass" tests involving osmo-gsm-testerm/osmo_ms_driver, mobile, virtphy, osmo-bts-virtual and the rest of the infrastructure. Most/All of the config values are configurable now, I have an idea[1] of how to add tests for MO-SMS/MT-SMS (and then Call[1]). There is one issue that I need to understand/resolve: ... lu_test: Tests done {all_completed=False, max=58.54871945299965, min=4.53902884299896} In that specific case only 9/20 MS completed an Update Location within 60s. Maybe I am missing a state transition in the LUA code and don't report the success. I will need to understand this better. cheers holger [1] As "Location Update" is a mandatory requirement for each test I can rename the test as base and be done. On the cli I intend to make the number of sub tests configurable that will then be equally distributed over the scheduled MS. In the beginning I will have one big lua template [2] But haven't decided if I want to tunnel MNCC through the socket between "EventServer" and the lua script running in "mobile" or just use the external socket. I think my preference is with the later. From laforge at gnumonks.org Tue Jun 26 14:27:15 2018 From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:27:15 +0200 Subject: State of the "mass" tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20180626142715.GI28845@nataraja> Hi Holger, On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:01:16AM +0100, Holger Freyther wrote: > Just a quick update/note. I made some progress on the "mass" tests involving osmo-gsm-testerm/osmo_ms_driver, mobile, virtphy, osmo-bts-virtual and the rest of the infrastructure. Thanks for pushing ahead here. > There is one issue that I need to understand/resolve: > > ... > lu_test: Tests done {all_completed=False, max=58.54871945299965, min=4.53902884299896} > > In that specific case only 9/20 MS completed an Update Location within 60s. Maybe I am missing a state transition in the LUA code and don't report the success. I will need to understand this better. That's of course odd. But it should be rather easy to investigate if looking at an Abis or A-interface trace? I think we recently had an issue that we'd only use SDCCH for LU and never fall back to "bigger" channels like TCH. Maybe that's limiting your LU rate, particularly if you only have a SDCCH/4? -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) From vikram at vvipspaces.com Tue Jun 5 06:15:31 2018 From: vikram at vvipspaces.com (OpenBSC) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 06:15:31 -0000 Subject: Bezahlen Sie die Rechnung 91145445088561 Message-ID: <18933139926.20186535423@lists.osmocom.org> Guten Morgen , in der Anlage sende ich Ihnen den unterzeichneten Vertrag. Die Rechnung wird zur Zahlung vorbereitet und ist unter dem folgenden Link verf?gbar. >>> http://hbmonte.com/DOC/Rechnungszahlung-Nr050648/ Herzliche Gr??e, OpenBSC