should we continue to focus on nuttx?

Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.org
Tue May 1 07:19:19 UTC 2012


Hi Gregory,

thanks for your feedback, it is much appreciated.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:14:28AM -0700, Gregory Nutt wrote:
> So I have trouble understanding that the issue there.  And secondly,
> NuttX does have a rather complete graphics capability.  Probably the
> best in class:

The question is not whether it has the best graphics capabilities or
not.  The question is rather: Is it suitable for a 98x67 / 96x64
resolution display like in our target platforms?

To me, the NuttX graphics framework seemed to be aimed at much larger
resolution displays, more like a "real" computer with actual windows on
a desktop - not like a small cellphone where every pixel counts.
Please correct me if that impression was wrong.

So the question was not whether NuttX is good or bad - simply if it is
the best possible fit for our specific application :)

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




More information about the baseband-devel mailing list