From martian at seznam.cz  Wed Mar 14 14:54:43 2012
From: martian at seznam.cz (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Martin_Janovsk=FD?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:54:43 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
Message-ID: <4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>

Hi guys,

I'd like to build a test scenario for my thesis based on a Motorola C123 
and a PLL such as this
http://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/ICS501MLFT/800-1036-1-ND/1916104

Like this, I'd feed the multiplied clock to a USRP1 to run OpenBTS 
reliably. Would you help me choose the correct PLL if you understand the 
topic? I have little experience with circuit design.

Regards,

Martin Janovsk?


Dne 21.1.2011 17:47, Steve Markgraf napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On 11.04.2010 17:54, Steve Markgraf wrote:
>
>>> The third one is MCLK, i.e. the clock that the Calypos PLL feeds into
>>> the ARM core.
>> Ah, okay. But this one isn't accessible on all currently known phones
>> anyway.
> Just as an update on this idea: The Pirelli DP-L10 I have been playing
> around with recently exposes the MCLK pin.
>
> I've added a summary in the wiki:
>
> http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/PirelliDPL10#Phoneasclockgenerator
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
>



From 246tnt at gmail.com  Wed Mar 14 15:14:53 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:14:53 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j0_KBG9nK5+B=ZFQQcukpSRGdfrYCJvo6L1_vGkxHnL1tQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> I'd like to build a test scenario for my thesis based on a Motorola C123 and
> a PLL such as this
> http://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/ICS501MLFT/800-1036-1-ND/1916104
>
> Like this, I'd feed the multiplied clock to a USRP1 to run OpenBTS reliably.
> Would you help me choose the correct PLL if you understand the topic? I have
> little experience with circuit design.

That PLL looks fine, should work AFAICT.

Maybe just check the clock levels at the C123 output. If it's 2.5v
logic you may need to manually bias the PLL clock input and AC feed
the clock.

Cheers,

    Sylvain



From f.koliqi at gmail.com  Wed Mar 14 18:33:47 2012
From: f.koliqi at gmail.com (Fadil Berisha)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:33:47 -0400
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
Message-ID: <CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Martin,

I'd like to suggest you to consider clock-tamer or new design as
external clock for USRP -  http://code.google.com/p/clock-tamer/ .  It
is open source software and hardware project and it is was
specifically designed to be used with USRP. It is possible to use
phone as external clock for openBTS, but except proof of concept, that
solution does not have practical value.

Regards

Fadil



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Martin Janovsk? <martian at seznam.cz> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'd like to build a test scenario for my thesis based on a Motorola C123 and
> a PLL such as this
> http://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/ICS501MLFT/800-1036-1-ND/1916104
>
> Like this, I'd feed the multiplied clock to a USRP1 to run OpenBTS reliably.
> Would you help me choose the correct PLL if you understand the topic? I have
> little experience with circuit design.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin Janovsk?
>
>
> Dne 21.1.2011 17:47, Steve Markgraf napsal(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11.04.2010 17:54, Steve Markgraf wrote:
>>
>>>> The third one is MCLK, i.e. the clock that the Calypos PLL feeds into
>>>> the ARM core.
>>>
>>> Ah, okay. But this one isn't accessible on all currently known phones
>>> anyway.
>>
>> Just as an update on this idea: The Pirelli DP-L10 I have been playing
>> around with recently exposes the MCLK pin.
>>
>> I've added a summary in the wiki:
>>
>> http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/PirelliDPL10#Phoneasclockgenerator
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steve
>>
>>
>



From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu  Wed Mar 14 22:03:48 2012
From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:03:48 -0700
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de>
	<4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de> <4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>

I think the osmocomBB signal generator would be a great idea;
clock-tamers are significantly more expensive than calypso phones.

2012/3/14 Fadil Berisha <f.koliqi at gmail.com>:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I'd like to suggest you to consider clock-tamer or new design as
> external clock for USRP - ?http://code.google.com/p/clock-tamer/ . ?It
> is open source software and hardware project and it is was
> specifically designed to be used with USRP. It is possible to use
> phone as external clock for openBTS, but except proof of concept, that
> solution does not have practical value.
>
> Regards
>
> Fadil
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Martin Janovsk? <martian at seznam.cz> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'd like to build a test scenario for my thesis based on a Motorola C123 and
>> a PLL such as this
>> http://search.digikey.com/us/en/products/ICS501MLFT/800-1036-1-ND/1916104
>>
>> Like this, I'd feed the multiplied clock to a USRP1 to run OpenBTS reliably.
>> Would you help me choose the correct PLL if you understand the topic? I have
>> little experience with circuit design.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Martin Janovsk?
>>
>>
>> Dne 21.1.2011 17:47, Steve Markgraf napsal(a):
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 11.04.2010 17:54, Steve Markgraf wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The third one is MCLK, i.e. the clock that the Calypos PLL feeds into
>>>>> the ARM core.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, okay. But this one isn't accessible on all currently known phones
>>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> Just as an update on this idea: The Pirelli DP-L10 I have been playing
>>> around with recently exposes the MCLK pin.
>>>
>>> I've added a summary in the wiki:
>>>
>>> http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/PirelliDPL10#Phoneasclockgenerator
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>
>



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Wed Mar 14 23:45:35 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:45:35 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:03:48PM -0700, Kurtis Heimerl wrote:
> I think the osmocomBB signal generator would be a great idea;
> clock-tamers are significantly more expensive than calypso phones.

I agree with Kurtis.

In fact, I already tried to make such a circuit using a Ti CDCVF25084
some time ago, but it wasn't as straight-forwardd as I hoped and it was
never completed :(

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From alexander.huemer at xx.vu  Thu Mar 15 09:04:37 2012
From: alexander.huemer at xx.vu (Alexander Huemer)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:04:37 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <20120315090436.GA1430@de.xx.vu>

Hi Harald,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:45:35AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> In fact, I already tried to make such a circuit using a Ti CDCVF25084
> some time ago, but it wasn't as straight-forwardd as I hoped and it was
> never completed :(

A while back there was a posting[1] on the OpenBTS ML that mentioned
positive results using this exact PLL as clock input for a USRP. The
posting itself does not contain the part#, but I remember to have read
it in a follow up post or so. This setup did not use a phone as input to
the PLL, but nevertheless used such a PLL to feed the USRP.

Could you please elaborate on which problems you were facing?

Kind regards,
-Alexander Huemer

[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=24642256
[?]
http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2010-April/000322.html




From laforge at gnumonks.org  Thu Mar 15 09:56:57 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:56:57 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <20120315090436.GA1430@de.xx.vu>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120315090436.GA1430@de.xx.vu>
Message-ID: <20120315095657.GB7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:

> Could you please elaborate on which problems you were facing?

I think it was mostly related to the levels and coupling, possibly
combined with the 13 MHz signal being a sine wave and not square whihc I
believe the TI PLL expects.

It's probably 1.5 or 2 years since I tried that, I honestly don't
remember the details.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From alexander.huemer at xx.vu  Thu Mar 15 10:51:06 2012
From: alexander.huemer at xx.vu (Alexander Huemer)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:51:06 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <20120315095657.GB7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120315090436.GA1430@de.xx.vu>
	<20120315095657.GB7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <20120315105106.GB1430@de.xx.vu>

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> I think it was mostly related to the levels and coupling, possibly
> combined with the 13 MHz signal being a sine wave and not square whihc I
> believe the TI PLL expects.
As I understand the datasheet of the CDCVF25084 it can very well be the
case that a sine wave input makes trouble.
Assuming this is the case, could something like a Schmitt trigger
between the sine wave source and the PLL improve the situation?
Or would that add jitter or some other negative effects to the signal?

Kind regards,
-Alexander Huemer



From vogelchr at vogel.cx  Thu Mar 15 19:11:41 2012
From: vogelchr at vogel.cx (Christian Vogel)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:11:41 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <20120315105106.GB1430@de.xx.vu>
References: <4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de>
	<4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de> <4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120315090436.GA1430@de.xx.vu>
	<20120315095657.GB7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120315105106.GB1430@de.xx.vu>
Message-ID: <op.wa77lripunbdei@desolation.dillberg.com>

Hi Alexander,

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:51:06 +0100, Alexander Huemer  
<alexander.huemer at xx.vu> wrote:
> Assuming this is the case, could something like a Schmitt trigger
> between the sine wave source and the PLL improve the situation?
> Or would that add jitter or some other negative effects to the signal?

74AC(T)04 are considered quite excellent input stages (or amplifiers for  
fanout) for
timing signals.

See, for example, this posting on the "time-nuts" mailinglist (which is  
dedicated
to precision frequency measurement/timekeeping):

http://www.mail-archive.com/time-nuts at febo.com/msg26830.html

With a feedback resistors (say, a few 10kOhm) and a series input capacitor  
(a few nF)
the bias-DC of the input will automatically adjust to 1/2 duty cycle.

Using anything more fancy, for example high-bandwidth comparators, is  
frowned upon.

	Chris



From martian at seznam.cz  Thu Mar 15 12:20:45 2012
From: martian at seznam.cz (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Janovsk=FD?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:20:45 +0100
Subject: Use OsmocomBB as OpenBTS / airprobe clock generator
In-Reply-To: <20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20100410214745.GB3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1099B.8070504@steve-m.de>
	<20100411053705.GF3284@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<4BC1F0D1.5010809@steve-m.de> <4D39B891.3070306@steve-m.de>
	<4F60B133.60808@seznam.cz>
	<CACO6GO4UqeY70_r4vD0mEtntkmohRge1LqhcCFZp4+wT71im-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3=8S25wFXwTW0TY9SqsE04kztUC6JZE=kV7Y4f6Dfoa2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314234535.GU7841@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <4F61DE9D.5050804@seznam.cz>

Thanks everyone for opinion. I'm going to pursue the idea as far as I 
can, welcoming your advice in the future.

Price is my concern as well. The ClockTamer might be excellent but it's 
way over the top for me at the moment.
There are 7E9 people in the world for a reason. Some of us can work on 
different problems than others. :)

Dne 15.3.2012 00:45, Harald Welte napsal(a):
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:03:48PM -0700, Kurtis Heimerl wrote:
>> I think the osmocomBB signal generator would be a great idea;
>> clock-tamers are significantly more expensive than calypso phones.
> I agree with Kurtis.
>
> In fact, I already tried to make such a circuit using a Ti CDCVF25084
> some time ago, but it wasn't as straight-forwardd as I hoped and it was
> never completed :(
>




From 246tnt at gmail.com  Thu Mar  1 21:49:32 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:49:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Added option for mobile-app to bind to other interfaces
	than localhost.
In-Reply-To: <20120221155537.GC29148@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <1329834754-4970-1-git-send-email-osmocom@ehlers.info>
	<20120221155537.GC29148@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j0_SyaXU7nQxTg9guL+qomNKkrGOY=xRZtO1th2uTZCcAw@mail.gmail.com>

>
> I'm currently travelling and don't have time to test it right now.  I
> home one of the other developers with commit access will be able to try
> it.
>

I rewrote the libosmocore patch to use socket.c helper code.

Also updated libosmocore in osmocombb and merged Tim's patch.

Cheers,

    Sylvain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120301/2901ceda/attachment.htm>

From GNUtoo at no-log.org  Thu Mar  1 20:15:35 2012
From: GNUtoo at no-log.org (Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:15:35 +0100
Subject: [nuttx-bb] how to integrate nuttx-bb into upstream nuttx.
In-Reply-To: <20120228230418.GB21122@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <201202282217.37832.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
	<20120228230418.GB21122@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <201203012115.35187.GNUtoo@no-log.org>

>How did you do the analysis?  Just by looking at the header of the file,
>or actually analyzing the author name information in the git commit logs
>of those files?  The latter is probably more precise.  Of course you can
>skip any trivial one-line changes as they are not copyrightable.
I just looked at the header, that was quicker.

Denis.



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Thu Mar  1 21:11:37 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:11:37 +0100
Subject: [nuttx-bb] how to integrate nuttx-bb into upstream nuttx.
In-Reply-To: <201203012115.35187.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
References: <201202282217.37832.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
	<20120228230418.GB21122@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<201203012115.35187.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Message-ID: <20120301211137.GI21016@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Denis,

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> >How did you do the analysis?  Just by looking at the header of the file,
> >or actually analyzing the author name information in the git commit logs
> >of those files?  The latter is probably more precise.  Of course you can
> >skip any trivial one-line changes as they are not copyrightable.
>
> I just looked at the header, that was quicker.

yes, but also much less precise.  doing a git log on a file and grep'ing
for the author like:

git log --follow layer1/prim_fbsb.c | grep \^Auth  | sort | uniq

is not that hard.  Of course it only works in a repository that has the
complete history.

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From peter at stuge.se  Thu Mar  1 21:50:19 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:50:19 +0100
Subject: [nuttx-bb] how to integrate nuttx-bb into upstream nuttx.
In-Reply-To: <20120301211137.GI21016@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <201202282217.37832.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
	<20120228230418.GB21122@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<201203012115.35187.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
	<20120301211137.GI21016@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <20120301215019.14297.qmail@stuge.se>

Harald Welte wrote:
> > I just looked at the header, that was quicker.
> 
> yes, but also much less precise.  doing a git log on a file and grep'ing
> for the author like:
> 
> git log --follow layer1/prim_fbsb.c | grep \^Auth  | sort | uniq
> 
> is not that hard.  Of course it only works in a repository that has
> the complete history.

The data set can be reduced by looking only at the latest state of
the code:

git blame file.c | \
  sed 's,[^ ]\+ (\([^)]*\) [0-9]\{4\}-[0-9]\{2\}-[0-9]\{2\} .*,\1,' | sort -u

..since this is what would be contributed to upstream anyway.


//Peter



From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Thu Mar  1 17:15:47 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:45:47 +0530
Subject: ARFCH
Message-ID: <CADKJHGZ+=Qo+ph0N4ULDaT6DT2FfThiu+V=YZrMgFmNe38uaYA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am using Nokia 3310 to look at GSM traffic. The system information
messages are displayed in wireshark.

Is it possible to get the ARFCN of the becaon channel of the cell to
which the phone has locked from the System Information messages( SI )
?

I am getting confused because of the following screen shots which I
have attached.

Screen shot 1 says that the SI 4 message is in ARFCN 108.

Screen shot 2 says that the SI 4 message is in ARFCN 57.

So now which is the real ARFCN of the beacon channel in  my cell ?

Regards,
RM
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9636 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120301/b71a1ca7/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9656 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120301/b71a1ca7/attachment-0001.png>

From 775725965 at qq.com  Wed Mar  7 01:56:14 2012
From: 775725965 at qq.com (=?gbk?B?wvPM78rYzfvV3w==?=)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:56:14 +0800
Subject: a plan it is about a small GSM Station , i think use two phone ...... 
Message-ID: <tencent_620B52FF6240FC6A38D14115@qq.com>

i think use two phone to make GSM RF and  use wlan Router of usb Interface Connection two  phone .... the small GSM base station  maybe connection the internet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120307/16367ebb/attachment.htm>

From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Wed Mar  7 17:12:12 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 22:42:12 +0530
Subject: Airprobe main Mmailing list
Message-ID: <CADKJHGajfwh53fiHD_q+Qe8FCfO2ay5a7d_Gyw48q3yCRFN1uQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am looking for the airprobe mailing list. The only thing I get is
the a5/1 mailing list.

Where is the airprobe main mailing list archives kept?

Thanks and Regards,
RM



From wbg_1000 at yahoo.com  Sat Mar 10 14:51:22 2012
From: wbg_1000 at yahoo.com (eisencah eisenach)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 06:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: tsm30 source code
In-Reply-To: <CADKJHGajfwh53fiHD_q+Qe8FCfO2ay5a7d_Gyw48q3yCRFN1uQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGajfwh53fiHD_q+Qe8FCfO2ay5a7d_Gyw48q3yCRFN1uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1331391082.32534.YahooMailNeo@web112115.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

Hi.
Is there any place where I can download the TSM30 source code?? Found few torrents but they all seem to be dead.
Cheers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120310/287c48eb/attachment.htm>

From msokolov at ivan.Harhan.ORG  Sat Mar 10 17:16:26 2012
From: msokolov at ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:16:26 GMT
Subject: tsm30 source code
Message-ID: <1203101716.AA18761@ivan.Harhan.ORG>

> Hi.=0AIs there any place where I can download the TSM30 source code?=A0 Fou=
> nd few torrents but they all seem to be dead.=0ACheers.

It looks like the copy I've sent to Cryptome.org for preservation is
still up:

http://cryptome.org/tsm30/tsm30.7z

HTH,
MS



From carlos at mobipower.com.br  Sat Mar 10 23:06:05 2012
From: carlos at mobipower.com.br (Carlos Cecanecchia Neto)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:06:05 -0300
Subject: osmocom 
Message-ID: <002301ccff12$5f7fb180$1e7f1480$@com.br>

Dear Srs,

 

We are working in a project  that uses a GSM modem to send a GMSK beacom in
904 MHZ with 2W. 

 

This beacom send a random bits, but we only need to measure the RSSI

 

Visiting you site, we found a GSM RSSI software working in a phone.  

 

Can we use it in 904 Mhz ? This is the uplink GSM ARFCN channel 70. 

 

It is possible ?

 

Best Regards

 

Carlos Cecanecchia Neto

www.mobipower.com.br

55-11-3257.7736

 <http://www.mobipower.com.br/> New Picture (2)

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120310/41b42b73/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120310/41b42b73/attachment.png>

From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sun Mar 11 18:34:32 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:34:32 +0100
Subject: osmocom
In-Reply-To: <002301ccff12$5f7fb180$1e7f1480$@com.br>
References: <002301ccff12$5f7fb180$1e7f1480$@com.br>
Message-ID: <20120311183432.GN25693@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Carlos,

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 08:06:05PM -0300, Carlos Cecanecchia Neto wrote:
> We are working in a project  that uses a GSM modem to send a GMSK
> beacom in 904 MHZ with 2W. 

Is this an free software / open source / open hardware project? 

> Visiting you site, we found a GSM RSSI software working in a phone.  
> Can we use it in 904 Mhz ? This is the uplink GSM ARFCN channel 70. 
> It is possible ?

Yes, in general this is possible.

You will have to remove the receive filter of the phone, as it is
described in http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/Hardware/FilterReplacement
and replace it with soem baluns.

Please also note that the measurements at the moment are completely
uncalibrated.  If you need precision, I would suggest to calibrate each
phone individually.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From carlos at mobipower.com.br  Sun Mar 11 20:36:03 2012
From: carlos at mobipower.com.br (Carlos Cecanecchia Neto)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:36:03 -0300
Subject: RES: osmocom
In-Reply-To: <20120311183432.GN25693@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <002301ccff12$5f7fb180$1e7f1480$@com.br>
	<20120311183432.GN25693@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <000001ccffc6$96199c10$c24cd430$@com.br>

Harald,

No. This not a open hardware / open source project. It is for car
localization, in case of jammer use, that blinds the GPRS modem.

We tried to sniff that frequency, but was impossible, due the saw filters in
the GPRS modems (that only allow the to receive the uplink channel), and

for economic reasons. We to make a 20 units like this and we have a reduced
budget.

Do you think that is possible ? 

How much you think will cost a solution like that  ?

Regards 

Carlos Cecanecchia Neto
www.mobipower.com.br
55-11-3257.7736

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Harald Welte [mailto:laforge at gnumonks.org] 
Enviada em: domingo, 11 de mar?o de 2012 15:35
Para: Carlos Cecanecchia Neto
Cc: baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
Assunto: Re: osmocom

Hi Carlos,

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 08:06:05PM -0300, Carlos Cecanecchia Neto wrote:
> We are working in a project  that uses a GSM modem to send a GMSK
> beacom in 904 MHZ with 2W. 

Is this an free software / open source / open hardware project? 

> Visiting you site, we found a GSM RSSI software working in a phone.  
> Can we use it in 904 Mhz ? This is the uplink GSM ARFCN channel 70. 
> It is possible ?

Yes, in general this is possible.

You will have to remove the receive filter of the phone, as it is
described in http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/Hardware/FilterReplacement
and replace it with soem baluns.

Please also note that the measurements at the moment are completely
uncalibrated.  If you need precision, I would suggest to calibrate each
phone individually.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)




From akibsayyed at gmail.com  Mon Mar 12 12:51:06 2012
From: akibsayyed at gmail.com (Akib Sayyed)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:21:06 +0530
Subject: any one have clone of MTK project hosted on google
Message-ID: <CAMG-S91-oWkr7MVLMeZEnFhJS7SAiscAatDPv=2hAZdXtk3QjQ@mail.gmail.com>

guys i recently came across mobile-phone-mtk-project.googlecode.com
but it seems to be down.does any one have copy of this one??

also can be create osmocom like project with help of MTK chipsets??

-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243



From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Wed Mar 14 17:41:11 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:11:11 +0530
Subject: Video : Deepsec 2010 Targeted Dos Attack And Various Fun With Gsm Um
Message-ID: <CADKJHGZwacvmbRWJ1PN-3iY1KwzRezQHWMWTLTPx1gwunA92oA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am looking for this video. I found it at the official Deepsec video archives.

But you require to register to the video host site and I am unable to
download it using wget

Does any one know of any bit torrent site that has this video so that
I can download it?

Regards,
RM



From 246tnt at gmail.com  Wed Mar 14 18:07:51 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:07:51 +0100
Subject: Video : Deepsec 2010 Targeted Dos Attack And Various Fun With Gsm
	Um
In-Reply-To: <CADKJHGZwacvmbRWJ1PN-3iY1KwzRezQHWMWTLTPx1gwunA92oA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGZwacvmbRWJ1PN-3iY1KwzRezQHWMWTLTPx1gwunA92oA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j08P2vtdFxB43Po-awP=jdjdZh4+zs4qXnk2tD_PH0V4Fg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> I am looking for this video. I found it at the official Deepsec video archives.
>
> But you require to register to the video host site and I am unable to
> download it using wget
>
> Does any one know of any bit torrent site that has this video so that
> I can download it?

It's on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWXnHQiuoGA

There are various plugins/addons for browsers that allow youtube download IIRC.

Cheers,

    Sylvain



From peter at stuge.se  Wed Mar 14 18:10:18 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:10:18 +0100
Subject: Video : Deepsec 2010 Targeted Dos Attack And Various Fun With
	Gsm Um
In-Reply-To: <CAHL+j08P2vtdFxB43Po-awP=jdjdZh4+zs4qXnk2tD_PH0V4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGZwacvmbRWJ1PN-3iY1KwzRezQHWMWTLTPx1gwunA92oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j08P2vtdFxB43Po-awP=jdjdZh4+zs4qXnk2tD_PH0V4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120314181018.6852.qmail@stuge.se>

Sylvain Munaut wrote:
> > I can download it?
> 
> It's on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWXnHQiuoGA
> 
> There are various plugins/addons for browsers that allow youtube
> download IIRC.

Try the youtube-dl script.


//Peter



From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Wed Mar 21 04:54:48 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:24:48 +0530
Subject: Video : Deepsec 2010 Targeted Dos Attack And Various Fun With Gsm
	Um
In-Reply-To: <20120314181018.6852.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <CADKJHGZwacvmbRWJ1PN-3iY1KwzRezQHWMWTLTPx1gwunA92oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j08P2vtdFxB43Po-awP=jdjdZh4+zs4qXnk2tD_PH0V4Fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120314181018.6852.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <CADKJHGbNfXhymENFqXUWaTY-PqLffoFXMZqDteLuN-Bx0bcSbA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thanks a lot. I have downloaded the video

Regards,
RM



On 3/14/12, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Sylvain Munaut wrote:
>> > I can download it?
>>
>> It's on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWXnHQiuoGA
>>
>> There are various plugins/addons for browsers that allow youtube
>> download IIRC.
>
> Try the youtube-dl script.
>
>
> //Peter
>
>



From dave.meathead at googlemail.com  Tue Mar 20 18:33:49 2012
From: dave.meathead at googlemail.com (David Bahr)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:33:49 +0100
Subject: Working with OpenBSC + Osmocon: Paging response fails to activate
	SDCCH
Message-ID: <CALdYo7-hfp0oavK+RKnMXNeKUKwV3Q=OQ_uwv+iv3=V-Cg0f=w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Ive just setup  an OpenBSC + nanoBTS environment to experiment around with
your Osmocom software and a Motorola C123. I tried wo write a little
application similiar to app_ccch scan, which is able of responding to
paging requests by sending a rach request and the following paging response
procedure. The rach access is working fine, but i cant get the paging
response to work properly. The message itself is correct (layer2/layer3
parts) according to the specs. OpenBSC is also working correctly as it is
working with my normal cell phone or your mobile application.
What i'm doing in my code is the following:
1. After getting the immediate assignment i call l1ctl_tx_dm_est_req_h0 in
l1ctl.c (l1ctl_tx_dm_est_req_h0(ms,    arfcn, ia->chan_desc.chan_nr,
ia->chan_desc.h0.tsc, GSM48_CMODE_SIGN, 0)) in order to tune to the
assigned channel (or the h1 procedure for hopping).
2. Afterwards i build the paging response (layer2 + layer3), pad the msg
and send it via osmo_send_l1(ms, msg) similiar to l1ctl_tx_data_req in
l1ctl.c

That it is not working can be seen in the OpenBSC abis debug output:
<0004> abis_rsl.c:1318 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) Activating ARFCN(514) SS(0)
lctype SDCCH r=OTHER ra=0x67 ta=0
<0004> abis_rsl.c:1064 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) CHANNEL ACTIVATE ACK
<0004> abis_rsl.c:891 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) CONNECTION FAIL: RELEASING
CAUSE=0x01(Radio Link Failure)
<0004> abis_rsl.c:621 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) RF Channel Release CMD due
error 1
<0004> abis_rsl.c:658 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) RF CHANNEL RELEASE ACK
<0004> abis_rsl.c:594 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) is back in operation.

It should be looking like this:
<0004> abis_rsl.c:1318 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) Activating ARFCN(514) SS(0)
lctype SDCCH r=OTHER ra=0x10 ta=0
<0004> abis_rsl.c:1064 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) CHANNEL ACTIVATE ACK
<0000> abis_rsl.c:1490 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) SAPI=0 ESTABLISH INDICATION
<0003> gsm_04_08.c:1076 PAGING RESPONSE: mi_type=0x04 MI(...)

Has anyone an idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120320/0b5eae4d/attachment.htm>

From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Wed Mar 21 05:01:47 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:31:47 +0530
Subject: Frame Number--Paging
Message-ID: <CADKJHGadDs0anzN06mdqDSs5t0smOgCSppcoQA0X98-i3e6=UA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Lately I have been looking at the GSM traffic through wireshark. In
every packet, wireshark tells me about the frame number.

But a paging message is spread over four frames. (You need to read
four frames to get a single paging message.)

So which among these four frames does the frame number displayed in
wireshark correspond to for the paging message?

Regards,
RM



From 246tnt at gmail.com  Wed Mar 21 07:14:52 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:14:52 +0100
Subject: Frame Number--Paging
In-Reply-To: <CADKJHGadDs0anzN06mdqDSs5t0smOgCSppcoQA0X98-i3e6=UA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGadDs0anzN06mdqDSs5t0smOgCSppcoQA0X98-i3e6=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j0-e7LASCJy1CcqZS5YC4-aodqCSrf2GOWdsf-Xevkmdgw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> So which among these four frames does the frame number displayed in
> wireshark correspond to for the paging message?

I think we take the frame number of the first burst but I'm not sure
... In any case there can't be ambiguity because all the 4 bursts are
always "aligned" on the multiframe. (See GSM 05.02 series for
multiframe timings)

Cheers,

   Sylvain



From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Sat Mar 24 16:22:20 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:52:20 +0530
Subject: Frame Number--Paging
In-Reply-To: <CAHL+j0-e7LASCJy1CcqZS5YC4-aodqCSrf2GOWdsf-Xevkmdgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGadDs0anzN06mdqDSs5t0smOgCSppcoQA0X98-i3e6=UA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHL+j0-e7LASCJy1CcqZS5YC4-aodqCSrf2GOWdsf-Xevkmdgw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADKJHGYHcRPcBX7S_43E_1VdVtjRv49JYCRTce7n8VXgESDNQg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,


> ... In any case there can't be ambiguity because all the 4 bursts are
> always "aligned" on the multiframe. (See GSM 05.02 series for
> multiframe timings)


As far as I understand,  all the four burst are aligned on the frame
if you are listening to C0T0.

But paging bursts can also appear on C0T2, C0T4 and C0T6 depending on
channel configuration.

Regards,
RM



From rm.engineer84 at gmail.com  Wed Mar 21 06:07:26 2012
From: rm.engineer84 at gmail.com (R M)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:37:26 +0530
Subject: GSM specs describing Random Access Procedure
Message-ID: <CADKJHGamFcevnoxJi1s+QVWaC57_6iiw-9iKL8=whc2r08r88g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I want to understand the RACH channel acess procedure. I tried to
search for it in google. It doesnt lead me to the right GSM spec.

Does any one know which GSM spec details out the RACH link access procedure ?

Regards,
RM



From dburgess at jcis.net  Wed Mar 21 06:17:37 2012
From: dburgess at jcis.net (David A. Burgess)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:17:37 -0700
Subject: GSM specs describing Random Access Procedure
In-Reply-To: <CADKJHGamFcevnoxJi1s+QVWaC57_6iiw-9iKL8=whc2r08r88g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKJHGamFcevnoxJi1s+QVWaC57_6iiw-9iKL8=whc2r08r88g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <E2B4A609-133A-4BA3-A7A1-824142C6A7EA@jcis.net>



GSM 04.08


On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:07 PM, R M wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I want to understand the RACH channel acess procedure. I tried to
> search for it in google. It doesnt lead me to the right GSM spec.
> 
> Does any one know which GSM spec details out the RACH link access procedure ?
> 
> Regards,
> RM




From 246tnt at gmail.com  Wed Mar 21 07:12:57 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:12:57 +0100
Subject: GSM specs describing Random Access Procedure
In-Reply-To: <E2B4A609-133A-4BA3-A7A1-824142C6A7EA@jcis.net>
References: <CADKJHGamFcevnoxJi1s+QVWaC57_6iiw-9iKL8=whc2r08r88g@mail.gmail.com>
	<E2B4A609-133A-4BA3-A7A1-824142C6A7EA@jcis.net>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j09yQG0349sCq1sAjSkgi1sinYjy4qwKHv+fikBfe-HFTA@mail.gmail.com>

> GSM 04.08

And search for "CHANNEL REQUEST" because RACH is the name of the
channel while CHANNEL REQUEST is the name of the message in them ...

Cheers,

    Sylvain



From kandanalor at googlemail.com  Thu Mar 22 00:56:56 2012
From: kandanalor at googlemail.com (Dennis Weider)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:56:56 +0100
Subject: Problem building OsmocomBB
Message-ID: <CAHkYh16ptKLF0tTa+n4mdZHSs6Nn_fTFCqx62gVqOdXUSxwkNQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
I tried this tutorial to build my osmocomBB enviroment:
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/GettingStarted
I downloaded the gnuarm toolchain from here:
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/toolchain
I set the Path and i tried make, but it stops at

> arm-elf-ld: ../../shared/libosmocore/build-target/src/.libs/libosmocore.a(msgb.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 3)
> ../../shared/libosmocore/build-target/src/.libs/libosmocore.a: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
> make[1]: *** [board/compal_e88/hello_world.compalram.elf] Fehler 1

I found a similar Thread on the mailing list here:
http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/unknown-error-td2758006.html#a2763434
But there is not a solution for the problem

I would be happy if anybody would be able to giv a solution.
MFG Kandanalor



From kandanalor at googlemail.com  Thu Mar 22 01:33:14 2012
From: kandanalor at googlemail.com (Dennis Weider)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:33:14 +0100
Subject: Problem building OsmocomBB
In-Reply-To: <CAHkYh16ptKLF0tTa+n4mdZHSs6Nn_fTFCqx62gVqOdXUSxwkNQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHkYh16ptKLF0tTa+n4mdZHSs6Nn_fTFCqx62gVqOdXUSxwkNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHkYh1782d9MC5PUZkJ2RF9jtChtMau3viZ_sGgKEan6AB1JWg@mail.gmail.com>

Am 22. M?rz 2012 01:56 schrieb Dennis Weider <kandanalor at googlemail.com>:
> Hi!
> I tried this tutorial to build my osmocomBB enviroment:
> http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/GettingStarted
> I downloaded the gnuarm toolchain from here:
> http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/toolchain
> I set the Path and i tried make, but it stops at
>
>> arm-elf-ld: ../../shared/libosmocore/build-target/src/.libs/libosmocore.a(msgb.o): Relocations in generic ELF (EM: 3)
>> ../../shared/libosmocore/build-target/src/.libs/libosmocore.a: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
>> make[1]: *** [board/compal_e88/hello_world.compalram.elf] Fehler 1
>
> I found a similar Thread on the mailing list here:
> http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/unknown-error-td2758006.html#a2763434
> But there is not a solution for the problem
>
> I would be happy if anybody would be able to giv a solution.
> MFG Kandanalor

With help of the mailing list I realized that first time i tried to
compile I hadn't my cross compiler in PATH.
A "git clean -dfx" and "make" fixed the problem

MFG Kandanalor



From vogelchr at vogel.cx  Sat Mar 24 18:02:29 2012
From: vogelchr at vogel.cx (Christian Vogel)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:02:29 +0100
Subject: Patch: use-before-free in config_write_file
Message-ID: <20120324180228.GA7419@vogel.cx>

Hi Everyone,

while discussing config_file_write, I noticed that there's a use-after-free
bug in libosmocore config_write_file.

	Chris


From vogelchr at vogel.cx  Sat Mar 24 17:58:28 2012
From: vogelchr at vogel.cx (Christian Vogel)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:58:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix use-after-free in config_write_file
Message-ID: <mailman.46.1641743554.42824.baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org>

---
 src/vty/command.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/vty/command.c b/src/vty/command.c
index ab1eaca..b3595e5 100644
--- a/src/vty/command.c
+++ b/src/vty/command.c
@@ -2337,40 +2337,39 @@ DEFUN(config_write_file,
 			vty_out(vty,
 				"Can't unlink backup configuration file %s.%s",
 				config_file_sav, VTY_NEWLINE);
+			unlink(config_file_tmp);
 			talloc_free(config_file_sav);
 			talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
-			unlink(config_file_tmp);
 			return CMD_WARNING;
 		}
 	if (link(config_file, config_file_sav) != 0) {
 		vty_out(vty, "Can't backup old configuration file %s.%s",
 			config_file_sav, VTY_NEWLINE);
+		unlink(config_file_tmp);
 		talloc_free(config_file_sav);
 		talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
-		unlink(config_file_tmp);
 		return CMD_WARNING;
 	}
+	talloc_free(config_file_sav); /* we are done with config_file_sav by now */
 	sync();
+
 	if (unlink(config_file) != 0) {
 		vty_out(vty, "Can't unlink configuration file %s.%s",
 			config_file, VTY_NEWLINE);
-		talloc_free(config_file_sav);
-		talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
 		unlink(config_file_tmp);
+		talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
 		return CMD_WARNING;
 	}
 	if (link(config_file_tmp, config_file) != 0) {
 		vty_out(vty, "Can't save configuration file %s.%s", config_file,
 			VTY_NEWLINE);
-		talloc_free(config_file_sav);
-		talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
 		unlink(config_file_tmp);
+		talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
 		return CMD_WARNING;
 	}
 	unlink(config_file_tmp);
 	sync();
 
-	talloc_free(config_file_sav);
 	talloc_free(config_file_tmp);
 
 	if (chmod(config_file, 0666 & ~CONFIGFILE_MASK) != 0) {
-- 
1.7.5.4


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--



From vogelchr at vogel.cx  Sat Mar 24 21:00:37 2012
From: vogelchr at vogel.cx (Christian Vogel)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:00:37 +0100
Subject: Patch: recreated the C64 font.
In-Reply-To: <20120324180228.GA7419@vogel.cx>
References: <20120324180228.GA7419@vogel.cx>
Message-ID: <20120324210036.GA2017@vogel.cx>

The C64 font was updated from the BDF fonts. Applications will have to
be adapted to the changed base-line position (+2 pixels). The original
font was aligned to the cell boundary, not to the bottom line of the
actual characters.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Recreated-the-C64-font-using-bdf_to_c.py.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 76022 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120324/54b2b523/attachment.bin>

From gouchengcheng at gmail.com  Tue Mar 27 06:44:16 2012
From: gouchengcheng at gmail.com (gcc)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: about RACH DOS
Message-ID: <1332830656390-3860492.post@n3.nabble.com>

I am a student in a University studying on the security of GSM, recently I
want use osmocomBB to realize the RACH DOS attack mentioned in Dieter
Spaar`s speech. but I meet some difficulty.

I do as follow:

continuely  sending RACH to a cell,and  ignore the GSM48_MT_RR_IMM_ASS
message ,also i lock my phone to the attacked cell,but after some time,the
phone can still call to some phone ,why?

can anyone help me?

thanks! 

--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/about-RACH-DOS-tp3860492p3860492.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From akibsayyed at gmail.com  Tue Mar 27 10:45:49 2012
From: akibsayyed at gmail.com (Akib Sayyed)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:15:49 +0530
Subject: baseband-devel Digest, Vol 26, Issue 15
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2.1332842401.17265.baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org>
References: <mailman.2.1332842401.17265.baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org>
Message-ID: <CAMG-S91OghRDJfb6TmytFE_Xto_1uEtA0L2jv5+qaFVWmEPAXg@mail.gmail.com>

i am assuming that you are using one osmocom phone setup and one normal phone.
try to do as follows
take 3 osmocom phones
then try dos with 2 phones and put sim in 3rd and lock to same arfcn
and then see what happens.

cheeers

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:30 PM,
<baseband-devel-request at lists.osmocom.org> wrote:
> Send baseband-devel mailing list submissions to
> ? ? ? ?baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> ? ? ? ?https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/baseband-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ? ? ? ?baseband-devel-request at lists.osmocom.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ? ? ? ?baseband-devel-owner at lists.osmocom.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of baseband-devel digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> ? 1. about RACH DOS (gcc)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:?gcc <gouchengcheng at gmail.com>
> To:?baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
> Cc:
> Date:?Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject:?about RACH DOS
> I am a student in a University studying on the security of GSM, recently I
> want use osmocomBB to realize the RACH DOS attack mentioned in Dieter
> Spaar`s speech. but I meet some difficulty.
>
> I do as follow:
>
> continuely ?sending RACH to a cell,and ?ignore the GSM48_MT_RR_IMM_ASS
> message ,also i lock my phone to the attacked cell,but after some time,the
> phone can still call to some phone ,why?
>
> can anyone help me?
>
> thanks!
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/about-RACH-DOS-tp3860492p3860492.html
> Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> baseband-devel mailing list
> baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
> https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/baseband-devel
>



-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243



From saad.shafiq at and-or.com  Wed Mar 28 05:32:01 2012
From: saad.shafiq at and-or.com (saad_aol)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RSSI Firmware of OpenMoko GTA02
Message-ID: <1332912721795-3863628.post@n3.nabble.com>

Hi;
I am trying to run rssi.highram.bin on gta02(openmoko) following this [1]
gta02 is running SHR-lite distro
So far I have 
1. cross-compiled rssi firmware using arm-elf- toolchain
2. cross-compiled osmocon for phone using arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi- [2] 
	make -e CROSS_TOOL_PREFIX=arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-
HOST_CONFARGS="--host=armv4t-angstrom-linux-gnueabi"
3. Make sure that nothing else is using /dev/ttySAC0
4. loaded rssi firmware on gta02 by running on gta02
	./osmocon -i 13 -m romload -p /dev/ttySAC0 rssi.highram.bin 
Firmware loads succesfully when I toggle power of baseband using 
	echo 0 >/sys/bus/platform/devices/neo1973-pm-gsm.0/power_on && echo 1
>/sys/bus/platform/devices/neo1973-pm-gsm.0/power_on
but it scans only ARFCN 1 :<
SIM is present but since /dev/ttySAC0 is only claimed by osmocon, I dont
think it can be used by ogsmd

[1]  http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OpenMoko
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OpenMoko 
[2]  http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Toolchain
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Toolchain 

My QUESTIONS are:
=================
1. How can I Scan all ARFCN?
2. Can we use /dev/ttySAC0 for gsm & other things after the firmware is
loaded on baseband?

LOG FILE:
http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/file/n3863628/log log 


--
View this message in context: http://baseband-devel.722152.n3.nabble.com/RSSI-Firmware-of-OpenMoko-GTA02-tp3863628p3863628.html
Sent from the baseband-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



From alfonso.caponi at gmail.com  Thu Mar 29 12:48:12 2012
From: alfonso.caponi at gmail.com (alfonso caponi)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:48:12 +0200
Subject: Syntax error - LIBOSMOCORE
Message-ID: <CAF3e4iay22AJLrkEfy9gXF3YvUw_b39yTnmeUeJbtmSu1G_YDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi list,

sorry for this tedious question. I've already read a previous post about my
problem but has not been useful (
http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/2011-October/002351.html).
I've this error after the make:

checking for ranlib... ranlib
./configure: line 3508: syntax error near unexpected token `LIBOSMOCORE,'
./configure: line 3508: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCORE, libosmocore)'
make: *** [host/layer23/Makefile] Error 2

My settings with the last versions of sources:

- Linux ubuntu 2.6.38-11-generic-pae #50-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 12 22:21:04 UTC
2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
-
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/root/cell_logger/tool-chain/install/bin
- arm-elf-gcc -v (installed with
http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/GnuArmToolchain)
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-elf
Configured with: ./configure elf
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.2.3

- Makefile:

# this is the host tuple of your cross-toolchain
CROSS_HOST ?= $(shell which arm-elf-gcc >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo arm-elf ||
echo arm-none-eabi)

# this is the prefix of your cross-toolchain programs
CROSS_TOOL_PREFIX=$(CROSS_HOST)-

Any tips? :)

Thank you very much,
AL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120329/1b3044d7/attachment.htm>

From holger at freyther.de  Thu Mar 29 13:20:18 2012
From: holger at freyther.de (Holger Hans Peter Freyther)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:20:18 +0200
Subject: Syntax error - LIBOSMOCORE
In-Reply-To: <CAF3e4iay22AJLrkEfy9gXF3YvUw_b39yTnmeUeJbtmSu1G_YDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF3e4iay22AJLrkEfy9gXF3YvUw_b39yTnmeUeJbtmSu1G_YDw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F746192.7070500@freyther.de>

On 03/29/2012 02:48 PM, alfonso caponi wrote:

> checking for ranlib... ranlib
> ./configure: line 3508: syntax error near unexpected token `LIBOSMOCORE,'
> ./configure: line 3508: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCORE, libosmocore)'
> make: *** [host/layer23/Makefile] Error 2

install pkg-config




From alfonso.caponi at gmail.com  Thu Mar 29 14:24:44 2012
From: alfonso.caponi at gmail.com (alfonso caponi)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:24:44 +0200
Subject: Syntax error - LIBOSMOCORE
In-Reply-To: <4F746192.7070500@freyther.de>
References: <CAF3e4iay22AJLrkEfy9gXF3YvUw_b39yTnmeUeJbtmSu1G_YDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F746192.7070500@freyther.de>
Message-ID: <CAF3e4iZT3wp8Xd2e82Y0TWT9dG2imvdwqgKaZc1bTos2+ZRb5w@mail.gmail.com>

"pkg-config is already the newest version." :(

If I try to comment the lines in src/host/layer23/configure

PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCORE, libosmocore)
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOVTY, libosmovty)
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOGSM, libosmogsm)
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCODEC, libosmocodec)

I've an include error:

l1ctl.c:33:41: fatal error: include/osmocom/core/signal.h: No such file or
directory
compilation terminated.

signal.h exists into src/shared/libosmocore/include/osmocom/core/signal.h

:(

2012/3/29 Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger at freyther.de>

> On 03/29/2012 02:48 PM, alfonso caponi wrote:
>
> > checking for ranlib... ranlib
> > ./configure: line 3508: syntax error near unexpected token `LIBOSMOCORE,'
> > ./configure: line 3508: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCORE, libosmocore)'
> > make: *** [host/layer23/Makefile] Error 2
>
> install pkg-config
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120329/beb0823c/attachment.htm>

From 246tnt at gmail.com  Thu Mar 29 14:34:57 2012
From: 246tnt at gmail.com (Sylvain Munaut)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:34:57 +0200
Subject: Syntax error - LIBOSMOCORE
In-Reply-To: <CAF3e4iZT3wp8Xd2e82Y0TWT9dG2imvdwqgKaZc1bTos2+ZRb5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF3e4iay22AJLrkEfy9gXF3YvUw_b39yTnmeUeJbtmSu1G_YDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F746192.7070500@freyther.de>
	<CAF3e4iZT3wp8Xd2e82Y0TWT9dG2imvdwqgKaZc1bTos2+ZRb5w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL+j09Qo7MXtk=7y_z4A_obYMrRS-JxAvRiD5HZ7JWG1SB4cg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

> "pkg-config is already the newest version." :(
>
> If I try to comment the lines in src/host/layer23/configure
>
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCORE, libosmocore)
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOVTY, libosmovty)
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOGSM, libosmogsm)
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBOSMOCODEC, libosmocodec)
>
> I've an include error:

Well no kidding ... we didn't put these lines in there just for
giggles, they actually have a purpose. Whatever error you get after
you remove them is a consequence of removing them !

Your autotools/pkg-config/libtool setup is somehow broken, no idea why
... it's your distrib after all you should know how it works.

Cheers,

    Sylvain



From coinchon at yahoo.com  Thu Mar 29 14:20:25 2012
From: coinchon at yahoo.com (Mathias Coinchon)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Call for participation LSM/RMLL
In-Reply-To: <1333018174.33900.YahooMailNeo@web39306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <1333018174.33900.YahooMailNeo@web39306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1333030825.76488.YahooMailNeo@web39305.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Dear Osmocom community,


This email to inform you that the call for participation for the next Libre Software Meeting (LSM or RMLL: Rencontres Mondiales du Logiciel Libre) ends on 31st March: http://2012.rmll.info/en/participate/call-for-papers 


This edition will take place in Geneva from 7th to 12th July 2012 (7-8 general public days, 9-12 theme focused, professional).?

It would be of great interest for the communities to learn about the Osmocom projects in presentations or workshop. Real world applications would be interesting too. 


So please don't hesitate to directly submit.
Don't hesitate also to contact me for more information.

Mathias Coinchon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120329/5ca3103f/attachment.htm>

From laforge at gnumonks.org  Thu Mar 29 15:20:16 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:20:16 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Message-ID: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi all,

I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or bi-weekly)
in Berlin.

The idea would be not only to converge the existing developers in Berlin
(zecke, roh, prom, tobias, peter, kevin, myself, ...) but to also try to
share some knowledge and excitement with other interested hackers in the
wider community.

A split format for the event might make sense:  Have a more or less
organized 45min talk about one particular topic + 15min discussion and
then switch to an informal meeting style without any particular topic or
moderator.

For the first half there is a long list of topics intended at informing
people about the status and capabilities of the respective projects:
OsmocomBB, OsmoTETRA, OsmoGMR, SIMtrace, etc.

Regarding the venue, I would suggest to hold it at the Berlin CCC.

What do you generally think about this?

What day of the week should we be aiming at?  Tuesday and Thursday is
generally not a good idea, as those are already occupied with other
events.

If you think it's a good idea, I would request/register the event with
the CCC Berlin.

Regards,
	Harald

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From peter at stuge.se  Thu Mar 29 19:41:20 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:41:20 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se>

Harald Welte wrote:
> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or
> bi-weekly) in Berlin.
..
> What do you generally think about this?

I say go for it. Bi-weekly sounds good.


> What day of the week should we be aiming at?

I like Wednesday.


//Peter



From t-openbsc at tobias.org  Fri Mar 30 10:06:43 2012
From: t-openbsc at tobias.org (Tobias Engel)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:06:43 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>

On 29.03.2012 21:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Harald Welte wrote:
>> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or
>> bi-weekly) in Berlin.
> ..
>> What do you generally think about this?
> 
> I say go for it. Bi-weekly sounds good.

I would say monthly is more realistic. But I'm also fine with bi-weekly.

>> What day of the week should we be aiming at?
> 
> I like Wednesday.

Me too.

-Tobias



From gzsombor at gmail.com  Fri Mar 30 11:37:11 2012
From: gzsombor at gmail.com (Zsombor)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:37:11 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <CAOO3hRBeCpP3xaDcAoyWy_bZVi1u_Y4v0X=Zh4intO7=v7OfvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se> <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>
	<CAOO3hRD5ToUhm6iGbn-o0fE50VPjPE=OAJ5Xg1bO835=v+QD-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOO3hRBeCpP3xaDcAoyWy_bZVi1u_Y4v0X=Zh4intO7=v7OfvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOO3hRBhLu91tCkDe6WnEuC7dRqPKAjoBxNwHKixs3c4d_kGWQ@mail.gmail.com>

Can you record the video about the presentations and upload to some video
sharing site ? I'm certain, that there would be some interest watching it :)

Thanks,
Zsombor

On 2012.03.30. 13:33, "Tobias Engel" <t-openbsc at tobias.org> wrote:

On 29.03.2012 21:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Harald Welte wrote:
>> I was pondering to start a regular ...
I would say monthly is more realistic. But I'm also fine with bi-weekly.


>> What day of the week should we be aiming at?
>
> I like Wednesday.
Me too.

-Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120330/cf939db7/attachment.htm>

From shadown at gmail.com  Fri Mar 30 11:37:13 2012
From: shadown at gmail.com (Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:37:13 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se> <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>
Message-ID: <C36A70FF-C72B-4901-9E70-A4D73CC30A6D@gmail.com>

The idea sounds great to me too.

On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Tobias Engel wrote:

> On 29.03.2012 21:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Harald Welte wrote:
>>> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or
>>> bi-weekly) in Berlin.
>> ..
>>> What do you generally think about this?
>> 
>> I say go for it. Bi-weekly sounds good.
> 
> I would say monthly is more realistic. But I'm also fine with bi-weekly.

Bi-weekly would give more chances to people who travel a lot, to at least make it to it once a month.

>>> What day of the week should we be aiming at?
>> 
>> I like Wednesday.
> 
> Me too.
> 
> -Tobias
> 




From akibsayyed at gmail.com  Fri Mar 30 17:27:29 2012
From: akibsayyed at gmail.com (Akib Sayyed)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:57:29 +0530
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <C36A70FF-C72B-4901-9E70-A4D73CC30A6D@gmail.com>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se> <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>
	<C36A70FF-C72B-4901-9E70-A4D73CC30A6D@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMG-S92nsPqgR=FPJuYwBWWpvt_U6Ju5eLA2owbFfRvKR2M3mw@mail.gmail.com>

even i am in.people who cannot participate please make some
arrangement for them like live streaming and chat support.
<http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live streaming>

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez
<shadown at gmail.com> wrote:
> The idea sounds great to me too.
>
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Tobias Engel wrote:
>
>> On 29.03.2012 21:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>> Harald Welte wrote:
>>>> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or
>>>> bi-weekly) in Berlin.
>>> ..
>>>> What do you generally think about this?
>>>
>>> I say go for it. Bi-weekly sounds good.
>>
>> I would say monthly is more realistic. But I'm also fine with bi-weekly.
>
> Bi-weekly would give more chances to people who travel a lot, to at least make it to it once a month.
>
>>>> What day of the week should we be aiming at?
>>>
>>> I like Wednesday.
>>
>> Me too.
>>
>> -Tobias
>>
>
>



-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243



From holger at freyther.de  Fri Mar 30 19:13:22 2012
From: holger at freyther.de (Holger Hans Peter Freyther)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:13:22 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <CAMG-S92nsPqgR=FPJuYwBWWpvt_U6Ju5eLA2owbFfRvKR2M3mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120329194120.30742.qmail@stuge.se> <4F7585B3.5090006@tobias.org>
	<C36A70FF-C72B-4901-9E70-A4D73CC30A6D@gmail.com>
	<CAMG-S92nsPqgR=FPJuYwBWWpvt_U6Ju5eLA2owbFfRvKR2M3mw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F7605D2.9040008@freyther.de>

On 03/30/2012 07:27 PM, Akib Sayyed wrote:
> even i am in.people who cannot participate please make some
> arrangement for them like live streaming and chat support.
> <http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live streaming>

Hi,

I don't think this is a good idea. It kills the local atmosphere without
having any real benefit. Every decision/code and most likely slides will be
public anyway.

z.




From alexander.chemeris at gmail.com  Thu Mar 29 20:31:05 2012
From: alexander.chemeris at gmail.com (Alexander Chemeris)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:31:05 +0400
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <CABmJbFVB2+QemOObbh9n2sLj6k5w5mUj=5jTfMNg-3jYRbXCfw@mail.gmail.com>

Harald,

Looks like a great idea to promote open-source in telecom and recruit
more devs into the community. Not to mention all other goals. I wish
you all the best in setting up this event and I wish I lived in
Berlin. :)

I have to schedule a new run of my seminars on GSM and OpenBTS in
Moscow as well. Hopefully it will bring more attention from Russian
audience as well.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 19:20, Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or bi-weekly)
> in Berlin.
>
> The idea would be not only to converge the existing developers in Berlin
> (zecke, roh, prom, tobias, peter, kevin, myself, ...) but to also try to
> share some knowledge and excitement with other interested hackers in the
> wider community.
>
> A split format for the event might make sense: ?Have a more or less
> organized 45min talk about one particular topic + 15min discussion and
> then switch to an informal meeting style without any particular topic or
> moderator.
>
> For the first half there is a long list of topics intended at informing
> people about the status and capabilities of the respective projects:
> OsmocomBB, OsmoTETRA, OsmoGMR, SIMtrace, etc.
>
> Regarding the venue, I would suggest to hold it at the Berlin CCC.
>
> What do you generally think about this?
>
> What day of the week should we be aiming at? ?Tuesday and Thursday is
> generally not a good idea, as those are already occupied with other
> events.
>
> If you think it's a good idea, I would request/register the event with
> the CCC Berlin.
>
> Regards,
> ? ? ? ?Harald
>
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> ? ? ? ? ? http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
>



-- 
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ??? ???????
http://fairwaves.ru



From osmocom at ngolde.de  Fri Mar 30 07:42:36 2012
From: osmocom at ngolde.de (Nico Golde)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:42:36 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <20120330074236.GA4863@nybble.binarybase.org>

Hi,
* Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> [2012-03-30 09:09]:
> > I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or bi-weekly)
> in Berlin.
> 
> The idea would be not only to converge the existing developers in Berlin
> (zecke, roh, prom, tobias, peter, kevin, myself, ...) but to also try to
> share some knowledge and excitement with other interested hackers in the
> wider community.

That's a pretty nice idea!

> A split format for the event might make sense:  Have a more or less
> organized 45min talk about one particular topic + 15min discussion and
> then switch to an informal meeting style without any particular topic or
> moderator.
> 
> For the first half there is a long list of topics intended at informing
> people about the status and capabilities of the respective projects:
> OsmocomBB, OsmoTETRA, OsmoGMR, SIMtrace, etc.
> 
> Regarding the venue, I would suggest to hold it at the Berlin CCC.

Sounds good to me!

> What do you generally think about this?
> 
> What day of the week should we be aiming at?  Tuesday and Thursday is
> generally not a good idea, as those are already occupied with other
> events.

I would probably be in favor of Wednesday. Monthly sounds 
good to me. I'm not sure if bi-weekly is a bit too 
optimistic when it comes to people preparing exciting stuff 
talks. I may be totally wrong though.

Cheers
Nico



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Fri Mar 30 10:00:42 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:00:42 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120330074236.GA4863@nybble.binarybase.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
	<20120330074236.GA4863@nybble.binarybase.org>
Message-ID: <20120330100042.GP27922@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Nico,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:

> I would probably be in favor of Wednesday

Great, then we have already three people in favor of Wednesday (which
would also work out fine for me).

> Monthly sounds good to me.  I'm not sure if bi-weekly is a bit too
> optimistic when it comes to people preparing exciting stuff talks. I
> may be totally wrong though.

We could meet every 2 weeks but only have a talk once par month as a
compromise.  But then, even some basic intro to all of the Osmocom
(sub)projects would keep us busy beyond the first year...

After all, this is not supposed to be a free training program in mobile
communications, but something interactive to get more people (more
easily) involved...

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From katrin at mobileactive.org  Fri Mar 30 19:17:17 2012
From: katrin at mobileactive.org (Katrin Verclas)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:17:17 +0000
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Message-ID: <113118383-1333135039-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1491659690-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>

Could not disagree more. We live-stream local events all the time with a very unobtrusive webcam/ustream and it bothers no one who is there but benefits all who are not.

Best,

Katrin

------Original Message------
From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Sender: baseband-devel-bounces at lists.osmocom.org
To: Akib Sayyed
Cc: baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Sent: Mar 30, 2012 3:13 PM

On 03/30/2012 07:27 PM, Akib Sayyed wrote:
> even i am in.people who cannot participate please make some
> arrangement for them like live streaming and chat support.
> <http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live streaming>

Hi,

I don't think this is a good idea. It kills the local atmosphere without
having any real benefit. Every decision/code and most likely slides will be
public anyway.

z.



Sent via mobile. Hence, short.



From akibsayyed at gmail.com  Sat Mar 31 02:39:04 2012
From: akibsayyed at gmail.com (Akib Sayyed)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:09:04 +0530
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <113118383-1333135039-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1491659690-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
References: <113118383-1333135039-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1491659690-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
Message-ID: <CAMG-S91m3P7Nk+iLJMv2NcG=y3G8hQq2gz0W+Kib8bxrN=cK_w@mail.gmail.com>

in my opinion holger is thinking that
" it might become odd for people in conference to present as it is
being streamed live.or also they wont be able to act freely"

i think people are more interested to supporting main aim of meet.so
even if there is no proper protocol of communication is very much
ok(please correct me if i am wrong)

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Katrin Verclas
<katrin at mobileactive.org> wrote:
> Could not disagree more. We live-stream local events all the time with a very unobtrusive webcam/ustream and it bothers no one who is there but benefits all who are not.
>
> Best,
>
> Katrin
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
> Sender: baseband-devel-bounces at lists.osmocom.org
> To: Akib Sayyed
> Cc: baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
> Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org
> Subject: Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
> Sent: Mar 30, 2012 3:13 PM
>
> On 03/30/2012 07:27 PM, Akib Sayyed wrote:
>> even i am in.people who cannot participate please make some
>> arrangement for them like live streaming and chat support.
>> <http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live streaming>
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think this is a good idea. It kills the local atmosphere without
> having any real benefit. Every decision/code and most likely slides will be
> public anyway.
>
> z.
>
>
>
> Sent via mobile. Hence, short.



-- 
Akib Sayyed
Matrix-Shell
akibsayyed at gmail.com
akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
Mob:- +91-966-514-2243



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sat Mar 31 12:01:40 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:01:40 +0200
Subject: Recording / Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <113118383-1333135039-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1491659690-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
References: <113118383-1333135039-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1491659690-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
Message-ID: <20120331120140.GA27922@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Katrin,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:17:17PM +0000, Katrin Verclas wrote:
> Could not disagree more. We live-stream local events all the time with
> a very unobtrusive webcam/ustream and it bothers no one who is there
> but benefits all who are not.

And I couldn't disagree more with you.  The mere existance of the two
words 'camera' and 'unobtrusive' in one sentence are a contradiction in
terms.

If I want to meet with a small group of people and informally discuss
technical topic, than that is _very_ different from being live streamed
to an unknonwn number of people, any of which could make recordings and
I would have to very carefully think about each and every word that I'm
saying.   That's not a particularly relaxed environment and would kill
all the fun there is in having the meeting in the first place.

Legally, In Germany this corresponds to "not publicly spoken word"
(nicht oeffentlich gesprochenes Wort).  It is punishable under law to
record or broadcast that.  (Clause 201 of German criminal code).

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From katrin at mobileactive.org  Sat Mar 31 13:37:42 2012
From: katrin at mobileactive.org (Katrin Verclas)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:37:42 +0000
Subject: Recording / Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Message-ID: <1893188027-1333201059-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1141642911-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>

It was my understanding from your suggestion that there would be presentations and discussions after those presentations at the meetings, making this not just having a beer with friends but more formal affairs. 

That would be useful for people elsewhere to see, given that this is a global community.  Not sure what German law has to do with putting online or streaming such presentations.  Cameras off when it comes to the informal part and beer time.. 

Love this list otherwise. And will come to Berlin this summer so may attend one or two, regardless :)

Cheers from New York.


K 



------Original Message------
From: Harald Welte
To: Katrin Verclas
Cc: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Cc: Akib Sayyed
Cc: baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Recording / Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Sent: Mar 31, 2012 8:01 AM

Hi Katrin,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:17:17PM +0000, Katrin Verclas wrote:
> Could not disagree more. We live-stream local events all the time with
> a very unobtrusive webcam/ustream and it bothers no one who is there
> but benefits all who are not.

And I couldn't disagree more with you.  The mere existance of the two
words 'camera' and 'unobtrusive' in one sentence are a contradiction in
terms.

If I want to meet with a small group of people and informally discuss
technical topic, than that is _very_ different from being live streamed
to an unknonwn number of people, any of which could make recordings and
I would have to very carefully think about each and every word that I'm
saying.   That's not a particularly relaxed environment and would kill
all the fun there is in having the meeting in the first place.

Legally, In Germany this corresponds to "not publicly spoken word"
(nicht oeffentlich gesprochenes Wort).  It is punishable under law to
record or broadcast that.  (Clause 201 of German criminal code).

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Sent via mobile. Hence, short.

From martin at windycitysdr.com  Sat Mar 31 23:08:08 2012
From: martin at windycitysdr.com (Martin O'Shield)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:08:08 -0500
Subject: Recording / Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <1893188027-1333201059-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1141642911-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
References: <1893188027-1333201059-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1141642911-@b4.c4.bise6.blackberry>
Message-ID: <CAMeuOX80Nb-YpOyCyC9C87CbqO6_7M=V57dSA0VSwVkyOt2nsg@mail.gmail.com>

Katrin,


My reply below:

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Katrin Verclas <katrin at mobileactive.org>wrote:

> It was my understanding from your suggestion that there would be
> presentations and discussions after those presentations at the meetings,
> making this not just having a beer with friends but more formal affairs.
>
> That would be useful for people elsewhere to see, given that this is a
> global community.  Not sure what German law has to do with putting online
> or streaming such presentations.  Cameras off when it comes to the informal
> part and beer time..
>
>
I agree with Katrin!


> Love this list otherwise. And will come to Berlin this summer so may
> attend one or two, regardless :)
>

Me Too!  :-)

>
> Cheers from New York.
>

Cheers from Chicago!

>
>
> K
>
>
>
Sincerely,


Martin

>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Harald Welte
> To: Katrin Verclas
> Cc: Holger Hans Peter Freyther
> Cc: Akib Sayyed
> Cc: baseband-devel at lists.osmocom.org
> Cc: openbsc at lists.osmocom.org
> Subject: Recording / Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
> Sent: Mar 31, 2012 8:01 AM
>
> Hi Katrin,
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:17:17PM +0000, Katrin Verclas wrote:
> > Could not disagree more. We live-stream local events all the time with
> > a very unobtrusive webcam/ustream and it bothers no one who is there
> > but benefits all who are not.
>
> And I couldn't disagree more with you.  The mere existance of the two
> words 'camera' and 'unobtrusive' in one sentence are a contradiction in
> terms.
>
> If I want to meet with a small group of people and informally discuss
> technical topic, than that is _very_ different from being live streamed
> to an unknonwn number of people, any of which could make recordings and
> I would have to very carefully think about each and every word that I'm
> saying.   That's not a particularly relaxed environment and would kill
> all the fun there is in having the meeting in the first place.
>
> Legally, In Germany this corresponds to "not publicly spoken word"
> (nicht oeffentlich gesprochenes Wort).  It is punishable under law to
> record or broadcast that.  (Clause 201 of German criminal code).
>
> Regards,
>        Harald
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>
> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
>
> ============================================================================
> "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
>                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
>
> Sent via mobile. Hence, short.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120331/82b63040/attachment.htm>

From ml at mail.tsaitgaist.info  Sat Mar 31 00:18:31 2012
From: ml at mail.tsaitgaist.info (Kevin Redon)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:18:31 +0200
Subject: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
In-Reply-To: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
References: <20120329152016.GN19456@prithivi.gnumonks.org>
Message-ID: <1333152922-sup-3490@dennou>

Hi,

Excerpts from Harald Welte's message of Thu Mar 29 17:20:16 +0200 2012:
> 
> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or bi-weekly)
> in Berlin.

monthly soung good.
bi-weekly could also be a good way to invite/welcome new-comers and introduce
them to osmocom (which has 1000 subproject), for individual presentation,
workshop, tutorial, ... something informal, so to help in the beginnings.

> 
> The idea would be not only to converge the existing developers in Berlin
> (zecke, roh, prom, tobias, peter, kevin, myself, ...) but to also try to
> share some knowledge and excitement with other interested hackers in the
> wider community.

I will be there.
> 
> Regarding the venue, I would suggest to hold it at the Berlin CCC.

good place

> What day of the week should we be aiming at?  Tuesday and Thursday is
> generally not a good idea, as those are already occupied with other
> events.

wednesday is good for me.

kevin



From gouchengcheng at gmail.com  Fri Mar 30 02:36:46 2012
From: gouchengcheng at gmail.com (Chengcheng Gou)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:36:46 +0800
Subject: DOS in Cellular network
Message-ID: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello

I want to know how to implement a real DOS in the real  cellular network
using RACH Flood.As you know, using OsmocomBB ,you can only send flood to
one ARFCN at one time, so the phone can seaching for another ARFCN. So I
think the RACH Flood is less effective in practice, how about it? and if
not,a better suggestion on DOS in Cellular network?

Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120330/6827ec0c/attachment.htm>

From kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu  Fri Mar 30 03:21:52 2012
From: kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu (Kurtis Heimerl)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:21:52 -0700
Subject: DOS in Cellular network
In-Reply-To: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACyT-3nrZO4bYtd0Qiq3t8y=egZjk3f56DTVKFqOwO-ec6DumQ@mail.gmail.com>

Why not just jam the uplink? There's no particular reason to actually
send any RACHs or the like.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Chengcheng Gou <gouchengcheng at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I want to know how to implement a real DOS in the real? cellular network
> using RACH Flood.As you know, using OsmocomBB ,you can only send flood to
> one ARFCN at one time, so the phone can seaching for another ARFCN. So I
> think the RACH Flood is less effective in practice, how about it? and if
> not,a better suggestion on DOS in Cellular network?
>
> Thanks!



From Max.Suraev at fairwaves.ru  Fri Mar 30 05:18:14 2012
From: Max.Suraev at fairwaves.ru (Max.Suraev at fairwaves.ru)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:14 +0800
Subject: DOS in Cellular network
In-Reply-To: <CACyT-3nrZO4bYtd0Qiq3t8y=egZjk3f56DTVKFqOwO-ec6DumQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACyT-3nrZO4bYtd0Qiq3t8y=egZjk3f56DTVKFqOwO-ec6DumQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F754216.7070301@fairwaves.ru>

30.03.2012 11:21, Kurtis Heimerl ???????:
> Why not just jam the uplink? There's no particular reason to actually
> send any RACHs or the like.

It's simply orders of magnitude more effective: the amount of energy required to jam
entire cell is way bigger than the amount required for RACH transmission. This also
makes it much harder to locate the attacker. To put it other way - it's just
"greener" kind of DoS :)

Getting back to original question - one solution would be to use several phones to
run few osmocom stacks in parallel, each targeting its own ARFCN. Those phones are
dirt cheap anyway :)

-- 
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.ru



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Fri Mar 30 06:55:49 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:55:49 +0200
Subject: DOS in Cellular network
In-Reply-To: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120330065549.GK27922@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi Chengcheng,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:36:46AM +0800, Chengcheng Gou wrote:
> I want to know how to implement a real DOS in the real  cellular network
> using RACH Flood.

While we do research on cellular security on this list, I don't think we
endorse, encourage or otherwise help anyone to participate in hostile
and/or illegal activities.

You clearly talk about a a "DoS in the real cellular network", which
clearly sounds like you have some malicious motives and are not into
this for research.

Maybe you can explain more about yourself, why you are interested in
this and what the exact application is.

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From sebastien at lorquet.fr  Fri Mar 30 07:13:50 2012
From: sebastien at lorquet.fr (Sebastien Lorquet)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:13:50 +0200
Subject: DOS in Cellular network
In-Reply-To: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANV9D0=FB76nrMJSStxnDp7AvzZN7naSyGimepX6eX3v2S-PNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F755D2E.6020208@lorquet.fr>

my turn:

Hello,

I want to bring down the entire internet. I think I can do that in practice on
my LAN by DOSing the DNS server, but on the internet there are others. So I
think a DDOS on all root servers should be more efficient, how about it? Do you
have a better suggestion?

;-)

Have a nice week end!

Regards,
Sebastien

Le 30/03/2012 04:36, Chengcheng Gou a ?crit :
> Hello
>
> I want to know how to implement a real DOS in the real  cellular network using
> RACH Flood.As you know, using OsmocomBB ,you can only send flood to one ARFCN
> at one time, so the phone can seaching for another ARFCN. So I think the RACH
> Flood is less effective in practice, how about it? and if not,a better
> suggestion on DOS in Cellular network?
>
> Thanks!



From ondra2000 at centrum.cz  Fri Mar 30 12:43:49 2012
From: ondra2000 at centrum.cz (ondra2000 at centrum.cz)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:43:49 +0200
Subject: Older releases OsmocomBB
Message-ID: <20120330144349.3D41A6FD@centrum.cz>


Hi all,
please how can I download some older release of osmocombb source?I have compiled osmocombb source about 3 months ago and everything was ok...now I downloaded using git some new version and compile it and my phone repeatedly register/unregister with network. Sometimes if can call to this phone but I can't send SMS....So I want compile some older version of source code which worked for me. 
Thanks

BR Ondrej



From peter at stuge.se  Sat Mar 31 04:45:09 2012
From: peter at stuge.se (Peter Stuge)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:45:09 +0200
Subject: Older releases OsmocomBB
In-Reply-To: <20120330144349.3D41A6FD@centrum.cz>
References: <20120330144349.3D41A6FD@centrum.cz>
Message-ID: <20120331044509.24977.qmail@stuge.se>

ondra2000 at centrum.cz wrote:
> please how can I download some older release of osmocombb source?

Recommend study http://progit.org/book/


//Peter



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sat Mar 31 11:33:37 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:33:37 +0200
Subject: Older releases OsmocomBB
In-Reply-To: <20120330144349.3D41A6FD@centrum.cz>
References: <20120330144349.3D41A6FD@centrum.cz>
Message-ID: <20120331113337.GW27922@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:43:49PM +0200, ondra2000 at centrum.cz wrote:

> So I want compile some older version of source code which worked for
> me.  Thanks

just use git and check out an older version of it.  The beauty of
revision control systems is exactly that you can go back to any previous
point in time.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)



From martin at windycitysdr.com  Fri Mar 30 17:59:53 2012
From: martin at windycitysdr.com (Martin O'Shield)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:59:53 -0500
Subject: Please Stream it LIVE ---> Re: Regular Osmocom meeting in Berlin?
Message-ID: <CAMeuOX9hzZE2VRKqd1ktwhzvkw6q4UnJxAuWhok6WWAVXGXe4A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello All,

"People who cannot participate please make some arrangement for them like
live streaming and chat support. <http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live
streaming> "

I'd like to vote for this point as I wont be able to attend either but love
to be there.

Sincerely,


Martin



On Friday, March 30, 2012, Akib Sayyed <akibsayyed at gmail.com> wrote:
> even i am in.people who cannot participate please make some
> arrangement for them like live streaming and chat support.
> <http://www.ustream.tv/ support free live streaming>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez
> <shadown at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The idea sounds great to me too.
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Tobias Engel wrote:
>>
>>> On 29.03.2012 21:41, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>>> Harald Welte wrote:
>>>>> I was pondering to start a regular Osmocom meeting (monthly or
>>>>> bi-weekly) in Berlin.
>>>> ..
>>>>> What do you generally think about this?
>>>>
>>>> I say go for it. Bi-weekly sounds good.
>>>
>>> I would say monthly is more realistic. But I'm also fine with bi-weekly.
>>
>> Bi-weekly would give more chances to people who travel a lot, to at
least make it to it once a month.
>>
>>>>> What day of the week should we be aiming at?
>>>>
>>>> I like Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Me too.
>>>
>>> -Tobias
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Akib Sayyed
> Matrix-Shell
> akibsayyed at gmail.com
> akibsayyed at matrixshell.com
> Mob:- +91-966-514-2243
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120330/c13204e5/attachment.htm>

From andreas at eversberg.eu  Fri Mar 30 19:22:45 2012
From: andreas at eversberg.eu (Andreas Eversberg)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:22:45 +0200
Subject: battery and rx-level symbols
Message-ID: <4F760805.8010706@eversberg.eu>

hi christian,

just added a symbol font to display battery level and rx level to 
layer1. also i added these symbols to rssi.

regards,

andreas


From jolly at eversberg.eu  Fri Mar 30 19:15:45 2012
From: jolly at eversberg.eu (Andreas Eversberg)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:15:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] layer1/fb: Adding new font for symbols
Message-ID: <mailman.47.1641743554.42824.baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org>

The first symbols added are special characters to display battery
status and receive level.
---
 src/target/firmware/Makefile          |    3 +-
 src/target/firmware/fb/font.c         |    2 +
 src/target/firmware/fb/symbols.c      |  102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/target/firmware/include/fb/font.h |    1 +
 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 src/target/firmware/fb/symbols.c

diff --git a/src/target/firmware/Makefile b/src/target/firmware/Makefile
index 21892a4..a71eef6 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/Makefile
+++ b/src/target/firmware/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ APPLICATIONS?=hello_world compal_dsp_dump layer1 loader chainload rssi
 # Framebuffer support, board specific drivers
 # 	
 
-FB_OBJS=fb/framebuffer.o fb/font.o fb/helvR08.o fb/helvB14.o fb/c64.o
+FB_OBJS=fb/framebuffer.o fb/font.o fb/helvR08.o fb/helvB14.o fb/c64.o \
+	fb/symbols.o
 
 FB_e88_OBJS=$(FB_OBJS) fb/fb_bw8.o fb/fb_st7558.o
 FB_e99_OBJS=$(FB_OBJS) fb/fb_rgb332.o fb/fb_ssd1783.o
diff --git a/src/target/firmware/fb/font.c b/src/target/firmware/fb/font.c
index d98096f..18c1bfe 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/fb/font.c
+++ b/src/target/firmware/fb/font.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ extern const struct fb_font font_helvR14;
 extern const struct fb_font font_helvB14;
 // extern const struct fb_font font_helvB24;
 extern const struct fb_font font_c64;
+extern const struct fb_font font_symbols;
 
 const struct fb_font *fb_fonts[]={
 //	&font_4x6,
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ const struct fb_font *fb_fonts[]={
 	&font_helvB14,
 //	&font_helvB24,
 	&font_c64,
+	&font_symbols,
 };
 
 const struct fb_char *
diff --git a/src/target/firmware/fb/symbols.c b/src/target/firmware/fb/symbols.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f6c364
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/target/firmware/fb/symbols.c
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+#include <fb/font.h>
+static const uint8_t font_symbols_data[] = {
+/* @ battery - */
+	/*0000:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*0005:*/	0x60,	/* .##..... */
+	/*0006:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*0007:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*0008:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*0009:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*000a:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*000b:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*000c:*/	0x60,	/* .##..... */
+/* A battery empty */
+	/*000d:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*0012:*/	0xe0,	/* ###..... */
+	/*0013:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0014:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0015:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0016:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0017:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0018:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0019:*/	0xe0,	/* ###..... */
+/* B battery full */
+	/*001a:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*001f:*/	0xe0,	/* ###..... */
+	/*0020:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0021:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0022:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0023:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0024:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0025:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0026:*/	0xe0,	/* ###..... */
+/* C battery + */
+	/*0027:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*002c:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+	/*002d:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+	/*002e:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*002f:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0030:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0031:*/	0xc0,	/* ##...... */
+	/*0032:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+	/*0033:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+/* D radiation left */
+	/*0034:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*0039:*/	0x20,	/* ..#..... */
+	/*003a:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*003b:*/	0x20,	/* ..#..... */
+	/*003c:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*003d:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*003e:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*003f:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0040:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+/* E tower */
+	/*0041:*/	5, 5, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*0046:*/	0x20,	/* ..#..... */
+	/*0047:*/	0x50,	/* .#.#.... */
+	/*0048:*/	0x20,	/* ..#..... */
+	/*0049:*/	0x20,	/* ..#..... */
+	/*004a:*/	0x50,	/* .#.#.... */
+	/*004b:*/	0x50,	/* .#.#.... */
+	/*004c:*/	0x88,	/* #...#... */
+	/*004d:*/	0xf8,	/* #####... */
+/* F radiation right */
+	/*004e:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*0053:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+	/*0054:*/	0x40,	/* .#...... */
+	/*0055:*/	0x80,	/* #....... */
+	/*0056:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0057:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0058:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0059:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*005a:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+/* G no radiation */
+	/*005b:*/	3, 3, 8, 0, 0, /* width and bbox (w,h,x,y) */
+	/*005c:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*005d:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*005e:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*005f:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0060:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0061:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0062:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+	/*0063:*/	0x00,	/* ........ */
+};
+static const uint16_t font_symbols_offsets[] = {
+	0x0000 /* '@' */,
+	0x000d /* 'A' */,
+	0x001a /* 'B' */,
+	0x0027 /* 'C' */,
+	0x0034 /* 'D' */,
+	0x0041 /* 'E' */,
+	0x004e /* 'F' */,
+	0x005b /* 'G' */,
+};
+const struct fb_font font_symbols = {
+	.height = 8,
+	.ascent = 8,
+	.firstchar = 64, /* '@' */
+	.lastchar = 71,
+	.chardata = font_symbols_data,
+	.charoffs = font_symbols_offsets,
+};
+
diff --git a/src/target/firmware/include/fb/font.h b/src/target/firmware/include/fb/font.h
index 40a6974..9dee8ff 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/include/fb/font.h
+++ b/src/target/firmware/include/fb/font.h
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ enum fb_font_id {
 	FB_FONT_HELVB14,
 //	FB_FONT_HELVB24,
 	FB_FONT_C64,
+	FB_FONT_SYMBOLS,
 };
 
 extern const struct fb_font *fb_fonts[]; // note: has to match fb_font_id enum!
-- 
1.7.3.4


--------------020300040706040007050809
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
 name="0002-layer1-rssi-Adding-battery-status-and-rx-level-symbo.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename*0="0002-layer1-rssi-Adding-battery-status-and-rx-level-symbo.pa";
 filename*1="tch"


From jolly at eversberg.eu  Fri Mar 30 19:17:57 2012
From: jolly at eversberg.eu (Andreas Eversberg)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:17:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] layer1/rssi: Adding battery status and rx-level symbol to RSSI.
Message-ID: <mailman.48.1641743555.42824.baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org>

---
 src/target/firmware/apps/rssi/main.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/target/firmware/apps/rssi/main.c b/src/target/firmware/apps/rssi/main.c
index a189740..43713db 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/apps/rssi/main.c
+++ b/src/target/firmware/apps/rssi/main.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <osmocom/gsm/rsl.h>
 #include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_04_08.h>
 #include <osmocom/gsm/gsm48_ie.h>
+#include <battery/battery.h>
 
 enum key_codes key_code = KEY_INV;
 int key_pressed = 0;
@@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ static void print_display(char *text, int *y, int c)
 static void refresh_display(void)
 {
 	char text[16];
+	int bat = battery_info.battery_percent;
 
 	fb_clear();
 
@@ -179,9 +181,20 @@ static void refresh_display(void)
 		fb_setfg(FB_COLOR_BLUE);
 		fb_setfont(FB_FONT_HELVR08);
 		fb_gotoxy(0, 7);
-		fb_putstr("Osmocom Monitor Tool", -1);
-		fb_gotoxy(0, 10);
+		fb_putstr("Osmocom RSSI", -1);
+		fb_setfg(FB_COLOR_RGB(0xc0, 0xc0, 0x00));
+		fb_setfont(FB_FONT_SYMBOLS);
+		fb_gotoxy(framebuffer->width - 15, 8);
+		sprintf(text, "@%c%c%cC", (bat >= 30) ? 'B':'A',
+			(bat >= 60) ? 'B':'A', (bat >= 90) ? 'B':'A');
+		fb_putstr(text, framebuffer->width);
+		fb_gotoxy(0, 8);
+		sprintf(text, "%c%cE%c%c", (power >= 40) ? 'D':'G',
+			(power >= 10) ? 'D':'G', (power >= 10) ? 'F':'G',
+			(power >= 40) ? 'F':'G');
+		fb_putstr(text, framebuffer->width);
 		fb_setfg(FB_COLOR_GREEN);
+		fb_gotoxy(0, 10);
 		fb_boxto(framebuffer->width - 1, 10);
 	}
 	fb_setfg(FB_COLOR_BLACK);
-- 
1.7.3.4


--------------020300040706040007050809--



From gouchengcheng at gmail.com  Sat Mar 31 03:13:14 2012
From: gouchengcheng at gmail.com (Chengcheng Gou)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:13:14 +0800
Subject: how to debug the firmware apps
Message-ID: <CANV9D0k+3C7MqE9LFCYhVtsFM-1CyO1F1eASXZ+j6iSOdxvwRA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello

I want to write an app in the form of Firmware, and don`t know how to
debug it  effectively!
anyone has good suggestions, please?

Thanks!



From laforge at gnumonks.org  Sat Mar 31 12:09:30 2012
From: laforge at gnumonks.org (Harald Welte)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:09:30 +0200
Subject: how to debug the firmware apps
In-Reply-To: <CANV9D0k+3C7MqE9LFCYhVtsFM-1CyO1F1eASXZ+j6iSOdxvwRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANV9D0k+3C7MqE9LFCYhVtsFM-1CyO1F1eASXZ+j6iSOdxvwRA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120331120930.GC27922@prithivi.gnumonks.org>

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0800, Chengcheng Gou wrote:

> I want to write an app in the form of Firmware, and don`t know how to
> debug it  effectively!

just like with any 'bare iron' code: Thinking about the problem and
adding debug printf's to your code (sometimes called "instrumentation").

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120331/23cb97f6/attachment.bin>