Fwd: gpsd support
laforge at gnumonks.org
Thu Feb 17 18:08:42 CET 2011
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> That's easy to do. I can maintain the original gps interface, so old code
> doesn't need to be fixed, and choose the support to use from an internal
> > A config file requesting the use of gpsd support should make the program
> > abort if it was compiled without gpsd support included.
> Not sure to agree. Execs from layer23/misc don't rely on config files.
> Probably that's due to the low number of switches used. I think that, even
> if cell_log options are increased, we can still use cmd switches. Do you
Yes, I agree with you. No need for introducing a config file.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the baseband-devel