This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org/.
Harald Welte laforge at gnumonks.orgOn Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:56:08PM +0800, suraev at stud.ntnu.no wrote: > 13.12.2011 02:02, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli пишет: > > > That's exactly what I was thinking about, since running the layer23 on the > > Application CPU is not a so good idea, it renders the phone usable only for a > > small period of time(since,in that configuration, you cannot suspend the AP > > CPU because it has to run the telephony code). > > I've probably missed this part of discussion. Could you re-iterate: is it technical > limitations that prevent us from porting layer23 onto calypso BP or it's simply lack > of manpower? It's really only the latter. There are probably a number of external references that need to be resolved (we don't have a full libc/libm in the target), as well as issues related to unaligned accesses. Also, the current 'mobile' code probably needs to be split into the actual 'logic' code (L2, L3, cell [re]selection, etc.) and the 'application' part (the VTY based interface we have right now). The higher-level interface of the 'logic' code and the application needs to be defined, probably as some kind of message queue of primitives. A first incremental step could be to move L2 (LAPDm) into the phone and use RSLms to talk with the existing PC-based 'mobile' application over the UART. Regards, Harald. -- - Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)