Hi Pau,
For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc.
but those were never
really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is
the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap.
What Vadim said explains my intention. I want to avoid attaching unneeded
pseudo-Um header when only RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, (even RR) PDUs are available.
AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the
T16L16V is placed?
Yes, exactly.
Best,
Shinjo
2024년 5월 13일 월요일 오전 10시 50분 12초 CEST에 Pau Espin Pedrol 님이 쓴 글:
> Hi Sinjo,
>
> I wonder whether we should be allocating gsmtap types for protocols
> which had to use alone so far.
For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc.
but those were never
really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is
the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap.
> I understand that somebody may want
to encapsulate eg LLC directly, but
> until there's a explicit need for it I'd perhaps avoid adding them to
> the list.
>
AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the
T16L16V is placed?
>
> Regards,
> Pau